Browse Cases

Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.

43759 cases tracked · 43759 currently active

Filters

Clear All

Showing 20 of 43759 matching cases

Southern District of Florida

Active Active litigation

This criminal case involves the United States government prosecuting Tunning and others under docket number 11-cr-20413. The court issued an order requiring responses from the government and probation office, and appointed a Federal Public Defender to represent the defendants. The procedural posture suggests ongoing

4 timeline events 4 press mentions
criminal-case criminal-law government-litigation +2 more

Central District of California

Active Active litigation

Samra Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery filed a lawsuit against United Healthcare Insurance Company, likely involving disputes related to insurance claims or coverage. The case docket indicates ongoing procedural activities, including a clerk's notice setting a Zoom hearing, suggesting active case management but no

7 timeline events 7 press mentions
civil-litigation discovery healthcare +3 more

Northern District of Illinois

Active Active litigation

Curtain Call Limited v. Island Records involves a motion for extension of time, reflecting procedural developments in a civil dispute likely related to intellectual property or contract issues given the parties involved. The court's order on this motion indicates active case management.

3 timeline events 2 press mentions
civil-litigation intellectual-property contract-dispute +3 more

Northern District of Illinois

Active Active litigation

Williams has filed a civil lawsuit against Orchard Hospitality Group LLC and others, docket number 25-cv-05954. The latest docket entry is a request for issuance of an amended summons, suggesting procedural steps to properly notify defendants or correct initial filings. The case is in early stages, focusing on

5 timeline events 5 press mentions
civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch
Advertisement

Central District of California

Active Active litigation

In the case 1:26-cv-01269 JEFFERSON v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, the plaintiff Jefferson has initiated legal action against the defendant, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). While specific details of the complaint are not disclosed, the dispute appears to involve a civil

6 timeline events 6 press mentions
civil-litigation settlement employment-law +3 more

Central District of California

Active Active litigation

In the case 1:24-cv-07215 Placencia Jr. v. NYC/NYC DOC, the plaintiff, Placencia Jr., has brought a legal action against the New York City and the New York City Department of Correction. The case involves a proposed stipulation and order, indicating that the parties may be seeking to resolve certain issues through

2 timeline events 2 press mentions
civil-litigation contract-dispute prisoner-rights +4 more

Central District of California

Active Active litigation

In the case 1:26-cv-03034 Davison Jr. v. LP Preservation HTC LLC/ Linden Plaza Property Management Company et al, the plaintiff Davison Jr. has brought a legal action against the defendants LP Preservation HTC LLC and Linden Plaza Property Management Company, among others. The docket notes a procedural matter

5 timeline events 5 press mentions
civil-litigation discovery settlement +4 more

Central District of California

Active Active litigation

The case 3:26-cv-03031 Howser v. Odins et al involves procedural considerations regarding the parties' consent or declination to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. This document reflects the parties' decisions on whether to have the case handled by a Magistrate Judge instead of a District Judge, which

4 timeline events 4 press mentions
civil-litigation discovery settlement +6 more

District of New Jersey

Active Active litigation

The District of New Jersey issued an arbitration award in Garuccio v. Cappiello, docket number 24-cv-07404. The award resolves the dispute through arbitration rather than court trial, binding the parties to the arbitrator's decision. This marks the conclusion of the arbitration phase and may limit further litigation

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation federal-courts

Southern District of New York

Active Active litigation

The Southern District of New York conducted a telephone conference in Zurich North America v. M/V Cornelius Maersk, docket number 24-cv-01481. The conference likely involved discussions on scheduling, discovery, or other procedural matters in this maritime insurance dispute. It reflects ongoing judicial involvement in

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation federal-courts

Southern District of New York

Active Active litigation

The Southern District of New York held a status conference in Watzka v. Adams Fairacre Farms, docket number 24-cv-06156. Status conferences allow the court to monitor case progress, address pending motions, and set deadlines. This event signals active case management by the court to move the litigation forward.

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation federal-courts

District of Columbia

Active Active litigation

The District of Columbia conducted a telephone conference in Dukes v. Carnahan, docket number 24-cv-01826. Telephone conferences typically address scheduling, discovery disputes, or case management issues. This conference likely aimed to coordinate the parties and the court on next steps or resolve procedural matters.

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation federal-courts

District of Columbia

Active Active litigation

The District of Columbia filed a notice in Moyer v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia, docket number 26-cv-00711. The notice is categorized as 'Other,' indicating a procedural or administrative update rather than substantive motions or rulings. The content of the notice may affect case scheduling or

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Southern District of New York

Active Active litigation

The Southern District of New York issued a case assignment notice in Arciola v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, docket number 25-cv-03986. This notice formally assigns the case to a specific judge or magistrate judge for all further proceedings. It marks a key step in case

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

District of Colorado

Active Active litigation

The District of Colorado granted an extension of time in DeLacy v. Omni Interlocken Company, L.L.C., docket number 25-cv-02980. This extension allows one or more parties additional time to meet a court deadline, such as filing a response or discovery document. The court's order reflects flexibility in managing

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation federal-courts

Central District of California

Active Active litigation

The Central District of California remanded Aguilar et al v. Laboratory Corporation of America, docket number 22-cv-09061, back to state court. The remand indicates the federal court found a lack of jurisdiction or other grounds to return the case to the state system. This procedural move shifts the venue and

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Central District of California

Active Active litigation

The Central District of California recorded a mediation report indicating a complete settlement in Hernandez v. Brookfield Properties, docket number 25-cv-07638. This report confirms that the parties resolved their dispute through alternative dispute resolution, likely ending the litigation without trial. The court

1 timeline event 1 press mention
civil-litigation settlement federal-courts

Southern District of New York

Active Active litigation

The Southern District of New York recorded a filing exceeding the standard page limit in Guenther v. Ourique et al, docket number 25-cv-07491. The excess pages filing suggests the submission of a lengthy brief or document beyond the court's usual constraints. This procedural event may impact the court's review

4 timeline events 4 press mentions
civil-litigation federal-courts