Browse Cases

Defendants lodged original deposition transcripts opposing the plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication under California Civil Code section 2306. The notice was filed on October 21, 2002, and included a request to lodge transcripts without possession by opposing counsel.

Plaintiff Intertainment certified service of its witness list for trial. The certificate was filed on October 17, 2002, confirming delivery to opposing counsel.

Plaintiff Intertainment certified service of its reply memorandum supporting the motion for summary adjudication on the inapplicable capacity defense. The certificate was filed on October 17, 2002.

Plaintiff Intertainment objected to a declaration submitted by defendants opposing its motion for summary adjudication under California Civil Code section 2306. The objection was filed on October 17, 2002.

Plaintiff Intertainment filed a reply memorandum supporting its motion for summary adjudication on the defense of inapplicable capacity. The filing was entered on October 17, 2002.

Plaintiff Intertainment filed a witness list for an upcoming trial. The filing was entered on October 17, 2002, showing the plaintiff’s readiness to present testimony at trial.

Defendants submitted a trial witness list for the franchise parties in a civil case. The filing was entered on October 17, 2002, signaling preparation for an upcoming trial.

Plaintiff Jane Doe filed a notice of partial dismissal in an unspecified civil case. The notice was entered on January 4, 2019, indicating that some claims or parties were dismissed before trial.

Jane Khan filed a civil complaint against all defendants, paying a $405 filing fee. The complaint was entered on March 7, 2025, but the disclosure statement on the civil cover sheet was not completed.

Northern District of California

This entry duplicates case 16660 — Calliditas Therapeutics AB v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. et al, docket 25-cv-00368. The docket event is the same scheduling order at entry 67. No additional facts distinguish this record from case 16660. The duplication may reflect a separate docket event logged under the same

Central District of California

This case involves a request for issuance of summons in a civil matter with docket number 26-cv-03176, filed by plaintiff Iorio against multiple defendants including Pro Clinix Sports Physical Therapy, Chiropractic Wellness, PLLC. The request for summons indicates a need to compel a party to appear in court

Central District of California

This case is a civil lawsuit filed in the United States District Court. The specific details of the case, including the parties involved and the nature of the dispute, are not provided in the current summary.

Northern District of Illinois

Plaintiff Julie Campbell requested a procedure for alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the case against defendants 24-Hour Medical Staffing Services, LLC. The request for ADR Procedure No. 1 aims to resolve the dispute outside of court.

Northern District of Illinois

This is a civil case where HFC Acceptance, LLC is suing AEZ Rent A Car LLC and others, with a scheduling notice issued for the proceedings.

Northern District of Illinois

This case involves a notice of voluntary dismissal filed by East Coast Plastic Surgery PLLC PA against Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. A voluntary dismissal typically occurs when a party decides to terminate a lawsuit without resolving the underlying legal issues, often due to strategic considerations or

Northern District of Illinois

Knowlton v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al involves claims against Meta Platforms and possibly other defendants. The docket indicates a proposed summons has been issued, marking an early stage in the litigation process where defendants are formally notified of the suit.

Northern District of California

Beth Rothman et al v. Acrisure of California et al involves procedural activity related to setting or resetting deadlines and hearings. The docket number is 26-cv-02601. Specific substantive issues or claims are not disclosed, but the case appears to be managing its litigation schedule.

Central District of California

This civil litigation involves Samra Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery as the plaintiff against Oscar Health, Inc. The docket references a Rule 7.1 letter, which typically pertains to corporate disclosure statements required in federal civil cases. The underlying dispute details are not provided. The case is in

Western District of Washington

The Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians filed a civil suit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The case involves setting or resetting procedural deadlines, indicating ongoing litigation management. The dispute likely concerns issues relevant to the tribe and federal agency, possibly involving

Western District of Washington

In Melnick v. Saldate et al, the court addressed a motion to strike, which challenges the adequacy or appropriateness of certain pleadings or evidence submitted by the parties. The ruling on this motion determines which materials the court will consider in the ongoing litigation, thereby influencing the scope and