Browse Cases

Thomas Tarbutton v. United States et al involves a federal financial entry related to a criminal case. The entry likely pertains to fines, restitution, or other monetary aspects of the criminal proceedings.

Central District of California

A brief was filed in the Central District of California under docket 25-cv-11510. The filing is a non-motion, non-appeal brief related to ongoing civil litigation.

The U.S. Supreme Court is considering a case involving the herbicide Roundup and its alleged cancer risks. Bayer, which acquired Monsanto, has set aside billions to settle claims that the product’s active ingredient causes cancer. The ruling could reshape pesticide regulation nationwide.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, with the Department of Justice, secured a settlement with Agri Stats Inc. over antitrust violations. The company shared competitively sensitive pricing data among meat processors, reducing competition and inflating prices for chicken, pork, and turkey.

Judge Solomon Oliver rejected the city of Cleveland’s request to end a federal consent decree governing police reforms. The judge found the city has not achieved substantial and effective compliance with the agreement’s material terms after more than a decade.

A federal judge declined to quickly approve Elon Musk’s $1.5 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission over delayed disclosure of a Twitter stake. The judge requested more information on the fairness and negotiation of the settlement.

Central District of California

A certificate or notice of interested parties was filed in the Central District of California under docket 26-cv-05025. This document identifies entities with a financial interest in the case outcome.

Central District of California

A civil cover sheet was filed in the Central District of California for docket 26-cv-02466. This filing initiates or accompanies a civil lawsuit involving a driver-related matter.

Southern District of Florida

Laramendi Navarro filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Southern District of Florida, docket 26-cv-23271. This filing challenges the legality of detention or imprisonment.

Southern District of Florida

Socorro initiated litigation against Vantage Carrier in the Southern District of Florida under docket 26-cv-60023. The case currently involves a motion for an extension of time.

Southern District of Florida

Origis Energy filed a lawsuit against Copper Hill in the Southern District of Florida. The docket number is 26-cv-20129. The case currently involves an extension of time request.

Timothy Barrett Sr. v. State of Florida remains active. The latest update involves a related opinion in Keith Taurus Hamlet Sr. State of Florida. The case is tracked by one media source.

Viswanauth Somwaru v. State of Florida is an active civil case. The latest development references an opinion in a related case, Trevorisse Thomas v. State of Florida, but no direct details are provided.

Jonathan Payton filed a civil lawsuit against Inspire Brands and Buffalo Wild Wings. The case is active, but no further details on claims or procedural developments are available.

US Bank Trust NA filed a lawsuit against Barbier. The case details, including court and docket number, remain unknown, limiting insight into the nature of the dispute or procedural posture.

Javier Gomez and others settled their civil dispute with UMG Recordings, Inc. and others, as shown by the settlement filing in docket 24-cv-04310. The settlement concludes the ongoing litigation.

The United States of America filed a Motion to Terminate the civil case against Kool Living, Inc. and others in docket 24-cv-07632. The motion seeks to end the litigation in the Southern District of New York.

Franz Haas GmbH/srl v. Winebow Inc. involves a mandate under USCA Rule 50. This mandate outlines procedural requirements for the parties following an appellate decision. The mandate governs the next steps in the litigation.

In USA v. Fraga, docket 17-cr-10320, a Notice of Case Assignment was filed, indicating a change in legal representation or court assignment. The case remains in the criminal docket.

Vanni v. State Court System features a defendant opposition to the plaintiff's motion. The opposition contests the relief requested, indicating active dispute over procedural or substantive issues.