Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
43237 cases tracked · 43183 currently active
Showing 20 of 43237 matching cases
Civil case currently marked active.
Civil case currently marked active.
Civil case currently marked active.
Northern District of Illinois
The case titled Michelle Bakula v. Circana, Inc. et al, docket number 26-cv-02797, involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Michelle Bakula, and the defendant, Circana, Inc., along with other parties. The case is currently under a stay, indicating that proceedings have been temporarily halted. Specific details
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
The Eleventh Circuit issued a ruling in Great Bowery v. Consequence Sound. The appellate decision resolves issues on appeal within the Eleventh Circuit's jurisdiction.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The Ninth Circuit ruled in Flores Jimenez v. Blanche. The appellate decision addresses legal issues within the Ninth Circuit, possibly involving immigration or civil rights.
An opinion was issued in Wash. v. Myers. The case details and court are unknown, but the opinion resolves a dispute between the named parties.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in Lopez Aguilar v. Blanche. The appellate decision likely involves federal or state law issues within the Ninth Circuit's jurisdiction.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The Ninth Circuit ruled in Morales Coro v. Blanche. The decision resolves appellate issues, possibly involving immigration or civil rights claims, common in this circuit.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in Solan v. Arizona. The appellate decision addresses issues pertinent to Arizona law or federal questions within the Ninth Circuit's jurisdiction.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
The Fifth Circuit issued a ruling in Noble v. Texas Pardons. The case likely involves challenges to pardon decisions or related state authority, though specifics are not provided.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in U.S. v. Bengston. The appellate decision addresses legal questions raised on appeal, but the ruling's substance is not detailed.
An opinion was issued in Community Loan Servicing v. Alston A. The case likely involves loan servicing or debt collection issues, though specifics are not provided.
The court issued an opinion in Green C v. Green S, resolving the dispute between the parties. The decision addresses the core issues raised but the details of the ruling remain unspecified.
Gonzalez v. Jane Doe et al involves a court-approved extension for the plaintiff to file a key document, the PSP. This extension affects the case timeline and may delay subsequent motions or hearings.
Apple Inc. initiated litigation against 1000 Van Ness LP, with proof of service filed to confirm formal notice to defendants. This confirms the case is underway, though no substantive issues have been disclosed.
N.G. et al v. Walgreen Co. proceeds with the court granting pro hac vice admission to out-of-state counsel. This procedural step signals active litigation but does not reveal substantive claims or defenses.
The case Che v. Rosa Family, LLC ended with the court terminating the proceedings. The termination likely reflects a settlement or procedural dismissal, but no details on the dispute or resolution were disclosed.
Manfredi v. Borla currently has only a docket remark with no substantive information on claims or procedural posture. The nature of the dispute remains unclear from available records.
RA Capital Healthcare Fund, L.P. v. ChemoCentryx, Inc. et al involves a notice of attorney appearance, substitution, or withdrawal, signaling changes in legal representation. The case details and claims remain unspecified in the docket summary.