Browse Cases

Central District of California

In Case v. Warden, San Quentin State Prison et al, the Central District of California granted an extension of time to complete discovery. This procedural order extends deadlines for gathering evidence and information. The extension affects the litigation timeline but does not address substantive claims or defenses.

District of Colorado

The District of Colorado court issued an Order to Show Cause in the case of Franco Guzman Lopez v. Facility Administrator et al. The order requires the parties to explain why the court should or should not take a specific action. This procedural step signals judicial scrutiny of case issues or conduct.

Central District of California

In USA v. Salazar-Cruz, the Central District of California recorded the advisement of statutory and constitutional rights to the defendant. This ensures the defendant was informed of their legal protections under criminal procedure. The record does not provide details on charges or subsequent proceedings.

District of Delaware

Unum Life Insurance Company of America filed a complaint against Montgomery and others in the District of Delaware. The defendants have submitted an Answer to the Complaint, indicating the case has moved past initial filing to responsive pleadings. The dispute likely involves insurance policy or benefits issues.

Central District of California

USA v. Landa-Rodriguez is a criminal case in the Central District of California where a request for a calendar date was submitted. This procedural step concerns scheduling hearings or trial dates to manage the court docket. It reflects ongoing case management efforts to ensure timely progression of the criminal matter.

Central District of California

The Central District of California court considered a motion for reconsideration in Alvin D. Carr v. The Bank of New York Mellon. The motion seeks to revisit a prior court decision, potentially altering the case's direction. The outcome of the motion could affect procedural or substantive aspects of the litigation.

District of New Jersey

In G.P. v. Arevalo et al, the District of New Jersey court granted leave for an out-of-state attorney to appear pro hac vice. This procedural order permits temporary legal representation by counsel not licensed in the jurisdiction. The ruling does not address the substantive issues of the case.

Central District of California

The Central District of California is handling a criminal case titled USA v. Sealed Defendant. The docket notes a stipulation and proposed order, indicating that parties have reached an agreement on a procedural matter or court order. The details of the defendant and charges remain sealed.

District of New Jersey

In the District of New Jersey, Howard filed a civil suit against Finance of America Holdings LLC. The court granted an unopposed extension of time for the defendant to answer the complaint, reflecting cooperation between parties on procedural deadlines. The case is in its early stages, focusing on pleadings and

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey court granted the defendant Kensuke Hanaoka an extension of time to file an answer to the complaint filed by Journay Financial Services, LLC and others. This procedural ruling adjusts the litigation schedule but does not address the substantive claims in the case. The extension allows the

Central District of California

USA v. Bejinaru is a criminal case in the Central District of California with a recent filing of a transcript. This suggests ongoing review or preparation for further proceedings such as sentencing or appeal.

Central District of California

Criminal case in C.D. Cal. currently marked active.

Central District of California

USA v. Barndollar is a criminal case in the Central District of California with a judgment and commitment order entered. This indicates the court has resolved the case with sentencing or detention decisions.

Central District of California

Civil case in C.D. Cal. currently marked active.

Central District of California

Civil case in C.D. Cal. currently marked active.

Northern District of California

USA v. Franklin in the Northern District of California has a recent status report filed. The report likely updates the court on case progress, motions, or scheduling. The case remains active with ongoing judicial oversight.

Central District of California

Civil case in C.D. Cal. currently marked active.

Western District of Washington

USA v. Ortiz et al in the Western District of Washington involves multiple hearings related to setting or resetting trial dates. The docket reflects ongoing case management activity. The case appears to be in the pretrial phase with active scheduling disputes or adjustments.

Central District of California

Tiaira Ransom sued Alejandro N. Mayorkas in the Central District of California. The docket contains no filings, indicating the case is at an initial stage or inactive. The complaint's subject matter and claims are not publicly available.

Central District of California

Jorge Luis Herrera filed a case against the State of California in the Central District of California. The docket shows no activity, suggesting the case is newly filed or inactive. The nature of the claims and procedural posture remain unclear.