Howmet Aerospace Inc. and others filed a civil suit against Cal-Tron Plating, Inc. and others under docket 20-cv-02586. The latest filing is an appearance pro hac vice, indicating out-of-state counsel has been granted permission to participate.
Browse Cases
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
42682 cases tracked · 42655 currently active
Showing 20 of 42682 matching cases
LNU v. SEMAIA et al is a civil case filed under docket 26-cv-02329. The available document is a civil cover sheet. No further substantive details about the claims or parties are provided.
The docket 25-cr-00584 for USA v. Salazar currently contains only a scheduling notice. No substantive case details or charges are available at this time. The case is criminal but lacks further public information.
Darryon M. Sutherlin was sentenced for committing a series of frauds over three years. His offenses included pandemic-related fraud, identity theft, and check fraud. The case involves multiple criminal fraud charges reflecting a pattern of deceptive conduct.
Connor J. Higgs, 20, of Jamestown, New York, was arrested and charged with possession and distribution of child pornography. The charges carry a mandatory minimum sentence of five years and a maximum of 20 years in prison. The case is criminal in nature and was announced by U.S. Attorney Michael DiGiacomo.
Northern District of Illinois
Pipe Fitters' Retirement Fund et al v. Diversified General Contractors, Inc. et al is a case where the plaintiff is seeking relief from the defendant. The court has issued an order, but the details of the order are not available. This case is currently ongoing and has not yet reached a resolution.
Northern District of Illinois
Salazar v. Northwest Community Hospital is a case where the court has issued an order on the plaintiff's motion for attorney representation. The court has granted the motion, allowing the plaintiff to be represented by an attorney. This case is currently ongoing and has not yet reached a resolution.
Northern District of Illinois
Williams v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. is a case where the plaintiff, Williams, is seeking an extension of time to file an answer to the defendant's complaint. The court has granted the extension, allowing Williams more time to prepare their answer. This case is currently ongoing and has not yet reached a resolution.
Northern District of Illinois
Booker v. Jackson Family Wines, Inc. is a case where the plaintiff, Booker, is seeking an extension of time to file a response to the defendant's motion. The court has granted the extension, allowing Booker more time to prepare their response. This case is currently ongoing and has not yet reached a resolution.
Northern District of Illinois
Magnuson et al v. Window Rock Residential Recovery Fund, L.P. et al is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 22-cv-01010. The current summary of the case is an extension of time, which is 79 pages long.
Northern District of Illinois
Cole v. Black Forest Decor, LLC is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 25-cv-13770. The current summary of the case is an order on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, which is 32 pages long.
Northern District of Illinois
Stewart v. Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 25-cv-03792. The current summary of the case is an order on a motion for miscellaneous relief. The order is 61 pages long.
Northern District of Illinois
Osborne v. De Maison Selections, Inc. is a civil case with an unknown court. The plaintiff, Osborne, has appeared pro hac vice. The case is ongoing with 22 days since the last update. The appearance of the plaintiff pro hac vice suggests that the case is still in its early stages.
Northern District of Illinois
Eason v. Raoul et al is a civil case where the plaintiff has requested an order on a motion for extension of time to answer. The current docket number is 23-cv-50462, and the case is currently in the unknown court. The plaintiff's request for an extension of time to answer suggests that the case is still in its early
Southern District of Florida
Barberi v. Best Union Auto Sales LLC et al is a civil case where the plaintiff has obtained a judgment by default. The current docket number is 26-cv-20033, and the case is currently in the unknown court. The plaintiff's claims and the defendant's response are not clear.
Southern District of Florida
USA v. Jasmin is a criminal case where the defendant has been issued a probation and a criminal summons. The current docket number is 26-cr-60102, and the case is currently in the unknown court. The defendant's response to the charges is not clear.
Southern District of Florida
Malenkovich v. Health Gorilla, Inc. is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 26-cv-22757. The current status of the case is unknown. This case involves a dispute between the plaintiff and Health Gorilla, Inc., but the details of the case are not publicly available. The plaintiff's
Southern District of Florida
Dieguez-Cuellar v. I.C.E. is a civil case where the plaintiff is seeking to change the venue of the case. The current venue is unknown, and the plaintiff is likely seeking to move the case to a different location due to some issue with the current location. The exact reason for the venue change is not publicly
Southern District of Florida
Medal et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 23-cv-01975. The current status of the case is Summons Issued. This case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs and Amazon.com Services LLC, but the details of the case are not publicly available.
Northern District of Illinois
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply was granted in this case, allowing the defendant more time to respond to the plaintiff's claims. This may indicate that the defendant needs additional time to prepare their response or gather evidence.