Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

Bernard sued Integrated Event and Parking Services, LLC and others in the Southern District of Florida, docket 24-cv-81384. No further summary details are available at this time.

Southern District of Florida

Hatten filed an appeal against the United States of America in the Southern District of Florida, docket 25-cv-62199. The appeal has been reinstated, indicating renewed appellate proceedings.

Southern District of Florida

Valhuerdi filed suit against Royal Caribbean Group in the Southern District of Florida, docket 26-cv-20406. A notice of mediator selection and/or hearing was filed, signaling movement toward alternative dispute resolution.

Southern District of New York

The United States is prosecuting Bucci in the Southern District of New York under docket 21-cr-00752. The current phase involves transferring the case out and sending supervised release documents, indicating post-conviction proceedings.

Southern District of New York

Villalva sued Arkan Food Corp. and others in the Southern District of New York, docket number 25-cv-06121. The case involves undisclosed claims against the defendants related to their business operations.

Southern District of New York

Norris has filed a civil case against Heavenly Finest Deli Inc. and others in the Southern District of New York. The specific claims or nature of the dispute are not detailed in the available information. The case is ongoing.

Southern District of Florida

The United States is prosecuting Perez in the Southern District of Florida under criminal docket 25-cr-10314. The court granted an extension of time, indicating ongoing procedural developments in the criminal case.

District of Columbia

Razdog Holdings LLC sued Twitch Interactive, Inc. in the District of Columbia under docket 24-cv-03638. The case status shows returned mail, indicating possible service or procedural issues affecting case progress.

The court released an opinion in Matter of Doyle ZZ v. Muriel YY. The case continues with this judicial development, though specific court and docket information are not disclosed. The opinion advances the civil matter.

An opinion was issued in Matter of Sarah RR v. Max GG. The case is active, but no further details are available. The opinion represents a judicial decision in this civil dispute.

The court issued an opinion in People v. Damone F. This criminal case shows judicial activity, though court and docket details are missing. The opinion impacts the prosecution or defense in this matter.

An opinion was issued in Matter of Dallas X v. Belinda Y. The case remains active with limited public information. The opinion marks a judicial development in this civil matter between the parties.

The court issued opinions in the matters of HR LR and HS v. PS. These judicial decisions advance the cases, although specific details on issues or court are not available. The opinions reflect ongoing adjudication in these matters.

The Department of Correction Community Supervision v. Wright case was ordered to mediation. This procedural development aims to resolve the dispute outside of trial. The case details remain limited but mediation signals a shift toward settlement efforts.

An opinion was issued in One Dutchess Phase 2 LLC v. Roman. The case is active, but court and docket information are not provided. The opinion represents a judicial step in this civil dispute involving the LLC and Roman.

The court released opinions in People v. Sabis and People v. Louis. These updates indicate judicial rulings in criminal cases, though specific details about the court or docket are missing. The opinions contribute to the resolution of these prosecutions.

Multiple judicial opinions were issued in various New York cases. The specifics of these cases, including court and docket numbers, are not disclosed. These opinions reflect active judicial decision-making in New York's legal system.

The court issued an opinion in Carruthers v. State of Tennessee, signaling progress in the litigation. Details on the court and docket remain unavailable, but the opinion marks a significant development in the case against the State of Tennessee.

Northern District of Illinois

Civil case in N.D. Ill. currently marked active.

District of Columbia

The United States is prosecuting Morrissey in the District of Columbia, docket 21-cr-00660. The current status notes mail returned, which may indicate communication issues with the defendant or counsel.