Browse Cases

• Filed

This federal civil lawsuit (2:21-cv-18151) seeks to hold Diopsys Inc. and various defendants accountable for alleged wrongdoing. The complaint outlines the legal claims and seeks damages or other relief.

• Filed

Simpson v. Food Ventures North America, Inc. et al is a civil lawsuit filed by Cita Simpson against Food Ventures North America. The complaint details allegations and seeks resolution through the court system.

• Filed

Walker v. Elite Comfort Solutions LLC et al involves a certificate and notice of interested parties filed in connection with a legal proceeding. The document outlines the parties' interests and the case's procedural status.

• Filed

Spencer Savings Bank v. Sepersky concerns a commercial litigation matter between Spencer Savings Bank and Sepersky. The case involves contractual disputes and seeks judicial resolution of the underlying issues.

• Filed

Valdez v. City of Fontana et al is a class action lawsuit filed by Isabel Valdez and others against the City of Fontana. The complaint alleges violations of constitutional rights and seeks class certification.

• Filed

Hohsfeld v. New Jersey Attorney General pertains to a legal dispute concerning state attorney general actions. The case outlines the parties' positions on the AG's authority and the claims at issue.

• Filed

The Lopez v. Commercial Metals Company et al lawsuit involves a joint discovery plan filed by the parties. The case seeks resolution through coordinated disclosure of relevant documents and evidence.

• Filed

The 8:26-cv-00924 case involves a civil cover sheet (CV-71) filed in the Southern District of New York. The cover sheet provides an overview of the case's procedural status and key details.

• Filed

In the 2:25-cv-07024 case, Dellafera has withdrawn as attorney for the plaintiff. This change in representation may affect the case's strategy and legal arguments moving forward.

• Filed

In the 5:26-cv-01021 case, Judge Striking has ordered the filing documents (CV-80) to be struck from the record. This procedural motion aims to remove certain submissions from consideration in the case.

• Filed

The 2:25-cv-12329 case concerns Auro Pr, Inc.'s lawsuit against RK Pharma, Inc. and others. The summary indicates the case has not yet provided substantive details in the current excerpt.

• Filed

In 2:25-cv-12111, Delmonico Liquor Market, LLC has voluntarily dismissed a federal case brought by the United States government. The dismissal follows the procedural requirements outlined in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

• Filed

The 3:26-cv-02379 case involves a group of minority secured lenders seeking remedies against Del Monte Foods Corporation. The exhibit referenced indicates additional documentation is attached to the case file.

• Filed

Shaw filed a notice of appearance in a lawsuit against the Metropolitan South State Police and others. The notice indicates Shaw's intention to participate in the legal proceedings.

• Filed

Disha filed a lawsuit against Cava Mezze Grill, LLC and others, but no summary information was provided. The case awaits further details.

• Filed

In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P., a consolidated lawsuit involving multiple claims against Purdue Pharma L.P. was used to terminate motions. The case aims to streamline the litigation process and address various claims against the defendant.

• Filed

Blackburn filed a lawsuit against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others, requesting the setting of hearings. The case seeks to establish specific dates for legal proceedings.

• Filed

Daniel Garcia initiated a lawsuit against M.E. Dey & Co., INC. and others, seeking to set and reset deadlines and hearings. The case involves multiple parties and procedural matters.

• Filed

Frank W. Leggett filed a lawsuit against MNET Financial Inc., alleging financial wrongdoing. The case seeks to hold the defendant accountable for alleged misconduct.

• Filed

The parties filed a motion seeking miscellaneous relief in the Atlas Global Technologies LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company litigation. The court will review the motion to determine if the requested relief is warranted.