Boniface Binene, a citizen of the Republic of Congo and a lawful permanent resident, has been sentenced to 14 years in federal prison. He was convicted of distributing fentanyl that resulted in the overdose death of a customer. U.S. Attorney Bart M. Davis announced the sentence. This sentence reflects the severe
Browse Cases
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
41467 cases tracked · 41467 currently active
Showing 20 of 41467 matching cases
The court issued an opinion in State of Tennessee v. John Collin Kilpatrick, but the details of the case are unknown due to a lack of information. The case was heard in the Tennessee state court system, but the specific court and docket number are not available.
The court issued an opinion in Reinstatement of Wescott to the Bar, but the details of the case are unknown due to a lack of information. The case was heard in the California state court system, but the specific court and docket number are not available.
The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division has concluded an investigation into UCLA's David Geffen School of Medicine. The investigation found evidence that UCLA's leadership intentionally selected applicants based on race in its admissions policies. This finding suggests potential violations of civil rights laws.
The court issued an opinion in Csizmazi v. Brady, but the details of the case are unknown due to a lack of information. The case was heard in the California state court system, but the specific court and docket number are not available.
Michael Marx, 45, of Midland, Texas, has been charged in a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for a shooting incident near the Washington Monument. A civilian bystander was struck by gunfire on May 4. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro announced the charges. The complaint outlines the allegations against Marx
The court issued an opinion in Dent v. City of Alameda Housing Authority, but the details of the case are unknown due to a lack of information. The case was heard in the California state court system, but the specific court and docket number are not available.
Kenneth Godwin, a Nigerian man, has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and unauthorized access to a protected computer. The indictment was announced by U.S. Attorney Ron Parsons in March 2026. These charges stem from alleged fraudulent activities involving
GL v. XL is a case that involves a dispute over an insurance claim. The plaintiff, GL, alleges that the defendant, XL, failed to pay a valid claim, resulting in financial losses for the plaintiff. The case is currently pending in the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Northern District of California
A notice has been filed in a case involving the submission of a foreign administrative record for preservation in the Northern District of California. This filing appears to be procedural, related to managing evidence or records from a foreign jurisdiction. The specific details of the underlying dispute are not
MC v. WG is a case that involves a dispute over a personal relationship. The plaintiff, MC, alleges that the defendant, WG, engaged in harassment and resulted in harm to the plaintiff. The case is currently pending in the Court of Appeal for the First District.
Northern District of California
Roshan has filed a U.S. Court of Appeals (USCA) memorandum in the Northern District of California. This document is part of an appellate proceeding, likely challenging a lower court's decision. The memorandum presents arguments for the appellate court's review. Its content will be key in determining the outcome of the
Mielke v. The Regents of the University of California is a case that involves a dispute over a university's decision to terminate a professor's employment. The plaintiff, Mielke, alleges that the university's decision was unfair and resulted in harm to the plaintiff. The case is currently pending in the Court of
District of New Jersey
DECARLO is proceeding in forma pauperis in a case against UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC D/B/A ALLIED UNIVERSAL et al in the District of New Jersey. This means the plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed with the lawsuit without paying court fees due to financial hardship. The filing includes a declaration
Ornelas v. De Jongs Dover Dairy is a case that involves a dispute over a business transaction. The plaintiff, Ornelas, alleges that the defendant, De Jongs Dover Dairy, breached a contract, resulting in financial losses for the plaintiff. The case is currently pending in the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Northern District of California
An order to show cause has been issued in the case of SVV Technology Innovations Inc. v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. in the Northern District of California. This order requires a party to explain why a certain action should or should not be taken. This is a procedural order that prompts a response from one of the parties.
People v. Letchaw is a case that involves a dispute over a conviction for a serious crime. The defendant, Letchaw, was convicted of a felony and is now appealing the conviction. The case is currently pending in the Court of Appeal for the First District.
Western District of Washington
Whole Foods Market faces a lawsuit in the Western District of Washington. A notice has been issued to counsel regarding the option to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This filing is procedural, offering parties the choice of a magistrate judge for their case. The underlying lawsuit against Whole
Potts v. Kern Allergy Medical Clinic is a case that involves a dispute over medical treatment. The plaintiff, Potts, alleges that the defendant, Kern Allergy Medical Clinic, provided substandard care, resulting in harm to the plaintiff. The case is currently pending in the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Southern District of New York
A plea agreement has been filed in the USA v. FARINA case in the Southern District of New York. This indicates the defendant has agreed to plead guilty to certain charges. This filing is a significant step towards resolving the criminal case. The terms of the plea agreement will dictate the sentencing and final