Browse Cases

Western District of Washington

Nasiry v. Noem is a civil case filed in the Western District of Washington, docket number 25-cv-02365. The current filing is a stipulated motion, a document filed by agreement of the parties. The motion is 9 pages long.

Western District of Washington

Criminal case in W.D. Wash. currently marked active.

A federal judge has sought clarification from the U.S. Supreme Court regarding an emergency order's impact on transgender Americans suing the State Department. The lawsuit challenges the State Department's policy on passport gender markers. The judge is reportedly baffled by the order's implications.

Cruz v. SJS Group LLC, docket number 25-cv-23369, is a closed case. The court has dismissed or closed a party or the entire case. The specific date of this action is not provided.

Oxamende v. SUSHI SAKE SWEETWATER LLC is an active case, identified by docket number 26-cv-23052. No current summary detailing the case's status or specific issues is available. The court where the case is filed is also not specified.

USA v. CURRY is a criminal case, docket number 23-cr-00689. The court has scheduled a hearing for the defendant. The case is currently pending, indicating active legal proceedings.

ELMILLIGY has filed a civil lawsuit against the UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others. The case, docket number 25-cv-12720, is currently pending. The specific allegations and court jurisdiction are not detailed.

WALSH has initiated a civil lawsuit against NAH and others, case number 26-cv-02086. The court has scheduled the termination of this civil case. This suggests the matter is nearing resolution, likely through dismissal or a final judgment.

The U.S. government has filed a criminal case against Dunyadar Gasanov and others, identified by docket number 21-cr-30017. The court is actively managing the case, having scheduled and reset hearings. The proceedings are ongoing.

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Lunn et al, docket number 25-cv-13229, has had a summons returned executed. This filing, a 14-page document, confirms that legal process has been formally served on the defendant(s). This is a standard step in initiating a lawsuit.

The Travelers Indemnity Company has filed a notice of removal in the case against Crothall Facilities Management, Inc. et al, docket number 26-cv-11936. This action moves the case from a lower court to federal jurisdiction. The notice itself is the primary filing.

Vinitsky v. Department of Correction, docket number 24-cv-13055, is a civil case. The court has issued an order setting motion and report and recommendation deadlines and hearings. This indicates the case is actively moving through its procedural stages.

Wolman v. Glide Publishing, LLC, docket number 19-cv-10104, involves a non-motion filing. A letter or request has been submitted to the court. The nature of this request and its implications are not detailed.

Bozhinov v. Grand Circle LLC et al is a civil case, docket number 25-cv-12373. No current summary of the case's status or proceedings is available. The court and specific details of the dispute remain unknown.

Harris v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, docket number 25-cv-10590, involves a procedural update. The court has issued a notice cancelling a previously scheduled hearing. The specific reasons for the cancellation are not provided.

Chew CPG, Inc. v. Hiya Health Products, LLC et al is a civil case, docket number 25-cv-12344. The court has issued a memorandum and order, a substantial 50-page document. The details of this order are not yet available.

Build et al v. Hitachi Kokusai Electric Comark LLC is a civil case that is proceeding towards resolution. The parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal, a 14-page document indicating their agreement to end the litigation. The docket number is 25-cv-30066.

This criminal case, USA v. Carter et al, involves a lengthy document filed by a party. The docket number is 19-cr-10104. The filing is described as a letter, not a formal motion, and spans 442 pages.

The criminal case USA v. Menard is now closed. The defendant, Menard, received early termination of probation. The date of this termination is not specified.

This civil case, Ross v. Benchling, Inc., is currently ongoing. The court has referred the matter to a magistrate judge for further proceedings. The specific date of this referral is not available.