Browse Cases

District of Massachusetts

Rodriguez et al. have requested an extension of time to file a response or reply in their case against Logitech Transport LLC. The court will review this request. The nature of the response or reply is not specified.

District of Colorado

Plaintiff Marchiori has filed a request to withdraw from an assignment in the case against Button II et al. This action is taken pursuant to Local Rule 83.38. The specifics of the assignment or the reasons for withdrawal are not provided.

Southern District of New York

Plaintiffs Maldonado Eslava et al. seek an extension of time in their case against Heavenly Delicatessen Market Group, Inc. The court is considering this request. The specific reasons for the extension are not detailed in the provided summary.

Southern District of Florida

The court has issued an order in the case of USA v. Rodriguez Castro et al. The criminal matter is docketed as 24-cr-20481 in the Southern District of Florida. This order, noted as 'PAPERLESS or pdf attached,' signifies a judicial decision or directive within the ongoing proceedings.

Southern District of Florida

An administrative order has been issued in Avolon Holdings Corp., et al v. Gentile et al. The case is docketed as 24-mc-23707 in the Southern District of Florida. Administrative orders typically concern the management and procedures of the court rather than the substantive merits of a case.

Southern District of Florida

An order on a motion to unseal case documents has been issued in USA v. Simon Fensterzaub. This criminal matter is docketed as 26-mj-06244 in the Southern District of Florida. This order pertains to the confidentiality of court records, indicating a specific procedural step has been taken.

Southern District of Florida

The court has issued an order on a motion to compel production of documents in Dryden v. Lynch et al. This civil case is proceeding in the Southern District of Florida under docket number 26-cv-60536. This order addresses a dispute over evidence discovery, indicating active litigation and a ruling on a key procedural

Southern District of New York

No specific filing or action is detailed for Hawkes et al v. Flaxville, LLC et al. The case is docketed as 22-cv-06393 in the Southern District of New York. This entry indicates an empty record for the specified filing, suggesting no recent activity or that the provided information is incomplete.

Southern District of New York

A pre-motion conference has been scheduled in the case of Sikorsky v. City of Newburgh, New York et al. The civil matter is being handled in the Southern District of New York under docket number 22-cv-02387. Pre-motion conferences are held to discuss anticipated motions and streamline the litigation process.

Southern District of New York

The United States of America v. Seabrook et al has received an order from the United States Court of Appeals (USCA). The criminal case is docketed as 16-cr-00467 in the Southern District of New York. This order from the appellate court signifies a decision on an appeal, potentially impacting the outcome of the

Southern District of New York

No specific filing or action is detailed for USA v. Beato-Estrella. The case is docketed as 24-cr-00520 in the Southern District of New York. This entry indicates an empty record for the specified filing, suggesting no recent activity or that the provided information is incomplete.

Southern District of New York

A detention hearing has been scheduled in the case of USA v. Reyes Torres. This matter is proceeding as a criminal case in the Southern District of New York under docket number 25-mj-03724. Detention hearings determine whether a defendant should be held in custody pending trial.

Southern District of New York

A notice of filing transcript has been submitted in the case of USA v. SAIF. This criminal matter is docketed as 25-cr-00278 in the Southern District of New York. Transcripts are official records of court proceedings, and their filing indicates that a hearing or proceeding has occurred and is being formally documented.

Southern District of New York

The court has set or reset deadlines and hearings in the case of USA v. Towers. This criminal matter is being handled in the Southern District of New York under docket number 25-cr-00544. These scheduling actions indicate that the case is actively moving through its pretrial or trial phases.

Northern District of Illinois

The United States of America, et al. has received a mandate from the United States Court of Appeals (USCA) in their case against Symphony Healthcare LLC, et al. The case is docketed as 20-cv-00348 in the Northern District of Illinois. A mandate from an appellate court typically signifies the conclusion of the appeal

Northern District of Illinois

Solomon has filed an opening brief in their case against Standard Insurance Company d/b/a The Standard Insurance Company. The case is proceeding in the Northern District of Illinois under docket number 26-cv-05111. This filing marks a significant procedural step, as the opening brief typically outlines the party's

Lucius v. Ludlam Point Miami, LLC has had a notice of settlement filed. The case is docketed as 26-cv-22374. This filing indicates that the parties have reached an agreement to resolve their dispute. The case is likely to be dismissed following this notice.

Northern District of Illinois

The case of Sampson v. Taiwo et al has been dismissed and closed. The order of dismissal was issued in the Northern District of Illinois under docket number 25-cv-10076. This closure signifies the termination of legal proceedings for all parties involved in this matter.

Central District of California

Very J, Inc. et al have sought and received an extension of time in their case against High Hope Intl Group Jiangsu Champion Holdings Ltd. et al. The matter is being handled in the Central District of California under docket number 25-cv-08131. This extension indicates that the parties require additional time to

Northern District of California

The plaintiff in Flores v. Senior Warden, Adelanto Detention Facility et al has voluntarily dismissed their case. The notice of voluntary dismissal was filed in the Northern District of California under docket number 26-cv-02194. This action concludes the proceedings initiated by the plaintiff. No further court action