A civil case was filed in the California 25th Circuit Court. The case details are currently unknown.
Browse Cases
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
40824 cases tracked · 40786 currently active
Showing 20 of 40824 matching cases
District of Columbia
Milliner v. Bock et al involves a court ruling on a motion to quash, which challenges the validity of a subpoena or summons. The court’s decision on this motion impacts the discovery process or service of process, influencing how evidence is gathered or how parties are formally engaged in the litigation.
Southern District of New York
The United States filed a lawsuit against MURPHY in the United States District Court. The case is currently pending, with no further information available.
District of New Jersey
Civil case in D.N.J. currently marked active.
Western District of Washington
This case, identified as In Re: Diana E Moller, involves procedural issues indicated by returned mail, suggesting difficulties in communication or service of process. The docket number 26-rd-00007 points to a possible regulatory or administrative matter, though specific details are limited.
Western District of Washington
In Re: Culverts, et al is a special proceeding case involving multiple parties, as suggested by the docket number and title. The recent Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel indicates a change in legal representation, which may affect case continuity. Details about the underlying dispute or the nature of the proceeding are
Western District of Washington
In re: Samish Motion is a special proceeding case marked by a Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel, signaling a recent change in legal representation. The docket suggests a procedural or administrative matter rather than a traditional civil dispute. Specific substantive issues remain unclear from the available information.
Western District of Washington
Confederated Tribes et al v. Quinault Indian Nation et al, docket 83-sp-00003, is a longstanding case involving tribal parties. A recent notice of withdrawal of counsel has been filed, indicating a change in legal representation for one or more parties. The case likely involves complex tribal or federal issues given
Western District of Washington
This case involves the matter titled In Re: Grays Harbor Adj., et al, docket number 83-sp-00004. The recent development is a Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel, indicating that the legal representative for one of the parties has formally withdrawn from the case. No further substantive details about the dispute or parties
Western District of Washington
In Re: Steelhead Management Plan, et al, involves a procedural development marked by a notice of withdrawal of counsel. This indicates a change in legal representation for one or more parties involved in the case. The nature of the underlying dispute is not detailed, but the case number suggests it may relate to
Western District of Washington
In Re: N-S Sound Treaty All, et al, similarly records a notice of withdrawal of counsel. This procedural event signals a change in legal representation within a case likely involving treaty or tribal matters, as suggested by the title. The specifics of the claims or issues remain unspecified. Such a withdrawal can
Western District of Washington
This case involves the S'Klallam RFD Halibu and others against the Lummi Indian Tribe. The matter appears to be related to tribal or indigenous rights, given the parties involved. The most recent procedural update is a notice of withdrawal of counsel, indicating a change in legal representation for one of the parties.
Western District of Washington
This case involves Alaska Sockeye and others, with limited information available. The latest docket entry is a notice of withdrawal of counsel, signaling a change in legal representation. The nature of the dispute is unclear from the available data.
Western District of Washington
The case titled Indian Halibut Share and others involves parties likely engaged in a dispute related to fishing rights or resource allocation. The most recent procedural update is a notice of withdrawal of counsel, indicating a change in legal representation for one party.
Western District of Washington
This matter concerns the Upper Skagit U & A versus the Lummi Indian Tribe and others, with recent docket entries showing a notice of withdrawal of counsel. The case likely involves tribal or land disputes, given the parties involved. The withdrawal of counsel may impact case progress and strategy.
Western District of Washington
This case features the Duwamish Tribe and others against the Nisqually Indian Tribe and others, with recent procedural updates noting a notice of withdrawal of counsel. The dispute likely relates to tribal matters or land claims. Changes in legal representation may influence case dynamics.
Western District of Washington
The Quileute Indian Tribe and others are engaged in litigation against the State of Washington, with recent docket entries indicating a notice of withdrawal of counsel. The case likely involves tribal-state disputes, possibly concerning land or jurisdictional issues. The withdrawal may affect case management and
Western District of Washington
The matter identified as docket 96-sp-00001 involves litigation with the Quileute Tribe. A recent filing indicates a notice of withdrawal of counsel, signaling a change in legal representation. No further details on the nature of the dispute or claims are provided.
Western District of Washington
The case In Re: Pacific Whiting Fish, docket 96-sp-00002, involves a notice of withdrawal of counsel. This procedural update indicates a change in legal representation for one party. The nature of the dispute or claims remains unspecified.
Western District of Washington
In Re: Mass Marking of Coho v. is a matter involving tribal or environmental interests, as suggested by the title. The recent procedural update notes a withdrawal of counsel, which may affect case progress or strategy. The underlying dispute likely concerns resource management or tribal rights.