Browse Cases

Western District of Washington

In the case of USA v. Morales-Morales, docket number 25-mj-00550, the court docket reflects the execution and return of a warrant. While specific details of the underlying charges or allegations are not provided, the procedural entry indicates that law enforcement successfully carried out the warrant authorized by the

Western District of Washington

In the case 3:24-cv-05879 Shakir v. City of Tacoma et al, the plaintiff Shakir has filed a reply to the defendants' response to a motion previously submitted. The case involves litigation against the City of Tacoma and other defendants, though specific factual allegations and claims are not detailed in the available

Western District of Washington

The case titled Scott v. Koshenmak, docket number 26-cv-05379, involves a procedural matter concerning an in forma pauperis (IFP) deficiency letter. The court issued this letter to address deficiencies in the plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of fees, indicating that the plaintiff must correct or

Western District of Washington

The case titled Rougeau v. Department of Corrections et al, docket number 26-cv-05301, appears to involve a dispute between the plaintiff, Rougeau, and the Department of Corrections along with other defendants. Specific details about the nature of the claims or the factual background are not provided, limiting the

Western District of Washington

In the case 2:25-cv-02635 Guangzhou Chaoyan Technology Co Ltd v. Anker Innovations Limited, the plaintiff Guangzhou Chaoyan Technology Co Ltd has filed a lawsuit against Anker Innovations Limited. The dispute involves a motion to which a response has been filed, indicating ongoing litigation activity. While specific

Western District of Washington

In the case of USA v. Campos Valencia, the court issued an order extending the time to file an indictment against the defendant. This procedural order allows the prosecution additional time beyond the original deadline to formally charge the defendant with criminal offenses. The extension ensures that the government

Western District of Washington

In the case of Wang v. Esurance Insurance Company et al, the plaintiff Wang has initiated litigation against Esurance Insurance Company and potentially other defendants. The case is identified by docket number 24-cv-00447. A key document in the proceedings is a declaration filed as part of the court record, which may

Western District of Washington

In the case titled Carrasco v. Suttell & Hammer PS et al, docket number 3:26-cv-05342, the plaintiff Carrasco initiated legal proceedings against the defendants Suttell & Hammer PS and others. The available document pertains to the affidavit of service of the summons and complaint, indicating that the defendants have

Western District of Washington

In the case Littman v. LeadPoint Inc et al, docket number 26-cv-05324, the plaintiff filed a complaint against LeadPoint Inc and other defendants. The court issued an In Forma Pauperis (IFP) deficiency letter, indicating that the plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees was incomplete or deficient

Central District of California

In the case of Michael Brian Smith v. Epson America Inc. et al, the plaintiff Michael Brian Smith has filed a motion-related declaration as part of ongoing litigation against Epson America Inc. and possibly other defendants. The case, docket number 24-cv-07270, involves a civil dispute, though specific details about

Central District of California

In the case of Wesley Africa v. Vision Path, Inc. et al, docket number 2:23-cv-04570, the parties are engaged in litigation involving the addition and termination of attorneys representing one or more parties. The case details, including the court and the underlying claims, are not specified in the available

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-11350 Lindsey Schantz v. General Motors LLC et al, the plaintiff Lindsey Schantz initiated legal action against General Motors LLC and potentially other defendants. The docket reflects a procedural development involving a letter of transmittal concerning the remand of the case to Superior Court

Central District of California

In the case United States of America v. Bytedance Ltd. et al, the U.S. government has initiated legal proceedings against Bytedance Ltd. and associated parties. The case involves the government's efforts to address concerns related to Bytedance's business practices and operations within the United States. Specific

Central District of California

The case titled Frank Dominguez v. Dean Jones et al, docket number 25-cv-09422, is currently in the early stages as indicated by the issuance of a scheduling notice. The notice likely outlines the procedural timeline for the case, including deadlines for motions, discovery, and other pretrial activities. No

Central District of California

In the case Alger v. Ashford CM Partners LP et al, docket number 24-cv-06482, the plaintiff Alger has filed an objection or opposition related to a motion in the ongoing litigation. The specific details of the motion or the underlying dispute are not provided, but the filing indicates active procedural engagement by

Southern District of New York

The case 1:17-cv-09375 Hernandez v. BMNY Contracting Corp. et al involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Hernandez, and the defendant, BMNY Contracting Corp., along with other parties. The docket includes a letter filed in the case, indicating ongoing communication or procedural matters before the court. Specific

Southern District of New York

In the case Filardi v. Mid America Pet Food LLC, docket number 23-cv-11170, the plaintiff has initiated litigation against Mid America Pet Food LLC. The case involves correspondence filed with the court, as indicated by a letter submitted in the docket. Specific details about the claims or procedural posture are not

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:23-cv-07331 Eletson Holdings Inc. et al v. Levona Holdings Ltd., the parties are engaged in a civil dispute, as indicated by the docket number and case title. The case involves Eletson Holdings Inc. and other plaintiffs bringing claims against Levona Holdings Ltd. The available document is an order

Southern District of New York

In the case of Thomas v. Doubleday Publishing et al, docket number 25-cv-06454, the plaintiff Thomas has brought a legal action against Doubleday Publishing and other defendants. The case involves a memorandum endorsement issued by the court, indicating judicial consideration of motions or procedural matters. Specific

Southern District of New York

The case 1:20-cv-08065 Bizelia et al v. Clinton Towers Management involves plaintiffs Bizelia and others bringing claims against Clinton Towers Management. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the docket includes a letter filed in the case, indicating ongoing communications or procedural matters