Browse Cases

Central District of California

The case titled Elena Adams v. ARS REI USA Corp et al, docket number 25-cv-03982, was dismissed as indicated by the court record. The dismissal suggests that the court concluded the matter without proceeding to trial or further litigation. Specific details regarding the grounds for dismissal or the nature of the

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-04725 Nathyn Boyd v. American Medical Response, Inc. et al, the parties have submitted a motion related to a protective order. The protective order typically governs the handling of confidential information exchanged during litigation, aiming to protect sensitive data from public disclosure. The

Central District of California

In the case of United States Liability Insurance Company v. Schooners Patio Grille, Inc. et al, the plaintiff, an insurance company, initiated legal proceedings against Schooners Patio Grille and other defendants. The case docket indicates the filing of an initial order upon the complaint, which is a procedural step

Central District of California

The case titled John Wesley Williams v. R. Beer et al, docket number 2:25-mc-00116, involves a miscellaneous matter filed in an unspecified court. The available document is a notice labeled as 'Other,' which suggests procedural or administrative activity rather than substantive litigation. Due to limited information

Central District of California

In the case titled Natalie Bennett v. Frank Bisignano, docket number 25-cv-09300, the court record includes a Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel, indicating a change in legal representation for one of the parties. The specific details of the underlying dispute between Bennett and Bisignano are not provided

Central District of California

In the case of Omar King v. Kingsley et al, docket number 22-cv-04484, a Bill of Costs was issued as reflected in the court document CV-59. The case appears to involve a civil dispute between the plaintiff, Omar King, and the defendants, Kingsley and others. The issuance of a Bill of Costs typically follows the

Western District of Washington

The case 2:24-cv-00062 Lysyy et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al involves plaintiffs Lysyy and others filing a lawsuit against Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and additional defendants. The docket entry referenced pertains to a motion to terminate certain proceedings or motions within the case

Western District of Washington

The case titled Moore v. Moore et al, docket number 3:26-cv-05267, involves a dispute between parties sharing the Moore name, suggesting a possible family or related-party conflict. The details available are limited, with a supplement filing referenced but no substantive information on the nature of the claims or

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 1:22-cv-06152 Footlick et al v. Topstep LLC et al, the parties are involved in litigation before an unspecified court. The docket entry referenced pertains to a motion or order regarding an extension of time, indicating procedural developments in the case schedule. Specific details about the underlying

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Traylor v. CVS Pharmacy et al, docket number 25-cv-15570, the plaintiff brought a legal action against CVS Pharmacy and other defendants. The case reached a judgment stage as indicated by the docket entry labeled Judgment - AO450. Specific details regarding the nature of the claims, factual background

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 3:25-cv-50314 Kradle et al v. Harpstreith et al, the court issued an order on a motion to stay proceedings. The motion to stay typically requests the court to pause or delay the case's progress, often pending the resolution of related matters or to conserve judicial resources. The order reflects the

Northern District of Illinois

In the case Briggs v. Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC et al, docket number 22-cv-03705, the plaintiff brought claims against Strategic Financial Solutions and other defendants. The case involves disputes likely related to financial or contractual matters, as suggested by the parties involved. An order was issued in

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Felipe Nery Gomez v. Frank Kokoszka et al, docket number 25-cv-11090, the court addressed a motion related to dismissal for lack of prosecution. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to actively pursue the litigation, which typically involves not meeting procedural deadlines or failing

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 1:23-cv-15429 Malhotra v. CVS Health, Inc. et al, the plaintiff Malhotra has initiated litigation against CVS Health, Inc. and other defendants. The docket entry referenced involves a motion or order to consolidate related cases, indicating that multiple lawsuits with similar facts or parties may be

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Adduci v. Foxx et al, docket number 24-cv-07512, the court granted an extension of time for one party to file their response or reply. The specific details of the underlying dispute are not provided, but the procedural development indicates ongoing litigation requiring additional time for briefing.

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Harris v. Selene Finance LP, docket number 24-cv-01866, the parties have filed a motion or order related to a protective order. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the protective order likely pertains to the confidentiality of certain documents or information exchanged during

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 1:25-cv-14643 Jeffries v. Fay Servicing LLC et al, the plaintiff Jeffries has filed a motion seeking leave to file a document in the ongoing litigation against Fay Servicing LLC and other defendants. The case docket indicates procedural activity related to document submissions, but specific details about

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled United States of America v. Bush, docket number 22-cv-05455, involves litigation initiated by the federal government against an individual or entity named Bush. Specific details regarding the nature of the dispute, claims, or defenses are not provided in the available information. The case appears to

Northern District of Illinois

Inman et al v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC et al is a civil case filed under docket number 22-cv-03737. The case involves plaintiffs Inman and others bringing claims against Mead Johnson & Company, LLC and additional defendants. The court issued an order regarding a motion for leave to file, addressing procedural

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled Bartels v. GSF USA, INC., docket number 25-cv-08541, involves a procedural motion concerning an extension of time. While specific substantive details of the dispute are not provided, the filing indicates that one party sought additional time to meet a deadline set by the court. Such motions are common