Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

This case involves Mpow Technology Co. Ltd and others filing a lawsuit against The Mortner Law Office P.C. and additional defendants. The current procedural posture includes a counterclaim, indicating that the defendants have responded with claims against the plaintiffs. The details of the counterclaim suggest

Southern District of New York

McKeon Rolling Steel Door Co., Inc. has initiated litigation against U.S. Smoke & Fire Corp. and others. The case currently involves a Bill of Costs and a Notice of Taxation, which typically relates to the determination and allocation of legal costs following certain rulings or judgments. This procedural step suggests

District of Columbia

In the criminal case USA v. Park, the government filed a reply to a motion, indicating active procedural developments in the litigation. The government's reply suggests ongoing disputes over pretrial or trial-related issues. This case involves the United States prosecuting an individual defendant, Park, under criminal

Northern District of California

In USA v. Payne, the court docket records a motion to withdraw as attorney filed by the defendant's counsel. The case involves a procedural development concerning a change in legal representation, though specific details about the underlying criminal charges or the case's procedural status are not provided. The

District of Columbia

In the case 1:25-cv-03810 Adedoye v. Department of Veterans Affairs, the plaintiff has filed a motion requesting the court's permission to submit a document. While the specific claims and factual background of the dispute with the Department of Veterans Affairs are not detailed in the available information, the case

Eastern District of Texas

In the case 1:25-cv-06369 Vasquez v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., the parties have submitted or are subject to a Protective Order. Protective Orders are typically issued to safeguard confidential or sensitive information exchanged during litigation, ensuring that such information is not disclosed publicly or used

Eastern District of Texas

This entry duplicates Brown v. Hursh Group, LLC, reflecting the same order on consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. No additional substantive information is provided beyond the procedural consent. The duplication underscores the procedural stance of the case, with the magistrate judge empowered to manage

Central District of California

The case titled USA v. Rodriguez, docket number 25-mj-70110, appears to be a criminal matter given the 'mj' designation, which typically refers to a magistrate judge proceeding. The available information is limited to a clerk's notice, and no substantive details about the charges, parties involved, or procedural

District of Columbia

UBNARE has filed a lawsuit against Trillian Technologies, Inc. The case details, including claims and factual background, are not available from the current summary. The dispute likely involves a civil matter given the parties involved.

District of Columbia

O'Connell has filed suit against the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. The docket notes activity related to setting or resetting deadlines, indicating ongoing procedural management. No substantive claims or factual context are provided in the current summary.

Central District of California

Masangsoft Inc. v. Jayce Azua et al is a civil litigation matter where a partial summary judgment has been issued. This indicates that the court has resolved some claims or defenses without a full trial, narrowing the scope of the dispute.

Central District of California

Perry Bruno et al v. Dr. Squatch, LLC is a civil case with recent status reports filed. The dispute may involve consumer or commercial claims against the company, though specific allegations are not detailed in the docket summary.

District of Columbia

In the civil case Perez v. Ketterer Browne & Associates, LLC et al., the plaintiff has filed a memorandum opposing a motion, signaling active litigation and contested issues between the parties. The opposition memorandum suggests that the defendants have sought relief or dismissal that the plaintiff disputes

District of Columbia

In Rigato v. Camey, the court issued an order referring a motion for further judicial review. This procedural step typically involves assigning the motion to a magistrate judge or another judicial officer to conduct a detailed examination and provide recommendations or rulings. The specific nature of the motion and

District of Columbia

The plaintiff, Toensing, has brought a legal action against the U.S. Department of Justice in the case Toensing v. U.S. Department of Justice. The case is currently at the status report stage, indicating ongoing procedural developments.

Central District of California

Antonio Munoz filed a civil lawsuit against KDY Transportation LLC. The docket entry notes a notice of appearance or withdrawal of counsel, indicating changes in legal representation. Such changes can affect case strategy and scheduling but do not directly impact substantive issues at this point.

District of Columbia

Webseed, Inc. and associated plaintiffs have initiated litigation against the U.S. Department of State and other defendants in the case 3:25-cv-03020. The case involves procedural motions, including a recent request for leave to file a document, indicating ongoing pretrial activity. The involvement of a federal agency

Central District of California

Barbara Potter filed a lawsuit against Sony Music Publishing US LLC and others, with the case identified by docket number 24-cv-09778. The recent procedural update involves an extension of time granted to file a response or reply, indicating ongoing pretrial motions or pleadings.

Central District of California

Kenita Mitchell filed suit against Tesla Motors, Inc. and others, docketed as 24-cv-02210. The case recently received a notification of a case number from the US Court of Appeals, suggesting that the matter may have been appealed or is proceeding in appellate court.

District of Columbia

LULAC v. Executive Office of the President is an appellate case involving the transmission of a supplemental record of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals. This procedural step is critical to ensure the appellate court has all necessary documentation from the lower court proceedings for review. The case is