Browse Cases

District of Delaware

In the case of Watson v. Benjamin et al., docket 24-cv-00966, the court has taken action to appoint counsel. This suggests that the matter may involve parties requiring legal representation, potentially indicating a civil dispute where one party lacks counsel. No further details on the claims or issues are provided.

District of Delaware

AAG Glass, LLC initiated a civil action against Laminados de Aller, S.A. and others under docket 21-cv-00638. No substantive summary or case details have been provided, leaving the nature of the dispute and claims unresolved.

District of Delaware

Earin AB brought a lawsuit against Skullcandy, Inc. under docket number 24-cv-00275. The only available update is a notice of service, indicating procedural progress but no substantive developments or case issues disclosed.

District of Delaware

Air Canada and co-plaintiffs filed suit against Localhost LLC under docket 23-cv-01177. The latest entry is a general scheduling order, which sets timelines for case management but does not provide insight into the claims or defenses involved.

District of Delaware

In the matter of Stimwave Technologies Inc. and related parties under docket 24-cv-01320, a mail return notice was filed, suggesting issues with service of process or communication. No further substantive information is available regarding the nature of the case.

District of Delaware

Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Sandoz Inc. under docket number 25-cv-01538. The case details and substantive issues remain unclear as the only available court entry is an order marked 'SO ORDERED,' indicating a procedural ruling without further elaboration.

District of Delaware

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Reed Semiconductor Corp. under docket 24-cv-00165. No case summary or details have been provided, leaving the nature of the dispute and legal claims unspecified.

District of Delaware

NJOY, LLC v. JUUL Labs, Inc. is a civil case likely involving competing companies in the vaping or tobacco product market. The docket note is a remark without substantive detail, suggesting early procedural posture or administrative activity. The dispute may involve intellectual property, marketing, or regulatory

District of Delaware

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and related parties initiated litigation against Moderna, Inc. and others under docket 24-cv-01136. The case details and court jurisdiction remain unspecified, but the dispute likely involves complex issues given the parties' profiles in the pharmaceutical industry. No further procedural

District of Delaware

Beckman Coulter, Inc. brought a case against Cytek Biosciences, Inc. under docket 24-cv-00945. The only available update is a correcting entry, indicating an administrative or clerical amendment to the case record. No substantive information about the dispute or claims is provided. The lack of detailed information

Northern District of California

This case involves Zoho Corporation PVT. LTD and others as plaintiffs against Orion Labs Tech, LLC. The current docket entry references a counterclaim, indicating that Orion Labs Tech has responded with claims against the plaintiffs. Details of the counterclaim and the underlying dispute are not provided in the

District of Delaware

Arbor Probate Research, Inc. has initiated litigation against Luty and others. The docket entry references an exhibit to a document, which may relate to evidence submitted in support of claims or defenses. The nature of the dispute is not specified in the available information.

Central District of California

Kirk M. Hallam has filed a lawsuit against Albert C. Gannaway and others. No further details or docket activity summaries are available to clarify the nature of the claims or defenses involved.

Central District of California

The case titled Latham Jr. v. Cole et al, docket number 1:26-cv-11329, involves a procedural step documented as a Notice of Service of Process. This indicates that the plaintiff has formally delivered legal documents to the defendants, initiating their required response in the litigation. The specific claims or

District of Delaware

This is a multidistrict litigation (MDL) concerning Entresto (Sacubitril/Valsartan) patent disputes. The docket entry references a notice of service, reflecting ongoing procedural activity in this consolidated patent litigation involving multiple parties and cases.

District of Delaware

Marquinez et al v. Dole Food Company Inc. et al is a civil action involving multiple plaintiffs against a major food company. The recent docket entry is a notice of service, indicating ongoing procedural steps in the litigation process. The nature of the claims is not detailed but may involve product-related or

District of Delaware

This entry duplicates the case OmniVision Technologies, Inc. v. RE Secured Networks, LLC with the same docket and redacted document status. It reflects the ongoing nature of the litigation but does not provide additional substantive information beyond the previous entry.

District of Delaware

The case Valjakka v. Netflix, Inc., docket number 22-cv-01490, involves a legal dispute brought by the plaintiff Valjakka against the streaming company Netflix, Inc. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the case is filed in a U.S. district court and has been referenced in appellate court filings. The

District of Delaware

Scale Biosciences, Inc. v. Parse Biosciences, Inc. et al, docket 22-cv-01597, involves a memorandum and order issued by the court. While the specific content of the order is not detailed, it likely addresses substantive or procedural matters in this civil dispute between two biosciences companies. The case may involve

District of Delaware

This entry duplicates the case concerning BANKRUPTCY PRO-HAC VICE FEES under docket 77-mc-07777. It similarly involves the processing of pro hac vice fees paid by two attorneys via credit card in bankruptcy court. The matter remains administrative in nature.