Browse Cases

• Filed

Levy Premium Foodservice Limited Partnership v. Future Legends, LLC et al involves a court order on a motion for leave, which typically concerns permission to file certain documents or undertake specific actions in the case. This procedural ruling affects how the litigation is managed and progresses. The decision on

• Filed

Zenteno et al v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company features a court-issued memorandum addressing aspects of the insurance dispute. Although details are limited, the memorandum likely discusses substantive or procedural matters such as coverage issues, claims handling, or contract interpretation. This case

• Filed

Joyce (PS) v. Porterfield et al involves a motion to amend, correct, or modify pleadings or court orders. This procedural step indicates that the parties seek to update or clarify the case record, which may alter the scope or nature of the litigation. Such motions are common in ongoing cases to address errors, add new

• Filed

Johnson v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al concerns a court order addressing restricted services within the Department of Corrections. The order likely pertains to limitations or regulations affecting the provision of services to inmates or staff, implicating operational policies within the correctional

• Filed

Melnick v. Raemisch et al involves a motion for reconsideration challenging or seeking clarification of a previous court decision. This procedural action reflects the parties' efforts to influence the court's interpretation or application of the law in their favor. The case remains unresolved pending the court's

• Filed

In Melnick v. Marlow et al, the parties have filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking the court to review and potentially amend a prior ruling. This indicates ongoing disputes or the presentation of new arguments that the court must evaluate to determine if the earlier decision should be altered. The case remains

• Filed

Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-25) - optional html form ( 3

• Filed

Miller v. Colorado Department of Revenue is a civil case involving a dispute with a state agency. Specific details regarding claims or the nature of the dispute have not been disclosed. The latest procedural update is a minute order, reflecting routine case activity. The case appears to be in early or intermediate

• Filed

Couture v. Experis US LLC et al is a civil case referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial management. Such referrals commonly address discovery disputes, settlement facilitation, and other procedural matters to streamline case progression. The referral indicates active judicial oversight aimed at efficient

• Filed

Wagner v. Greystar Global Enterprise, LLC is a civil case with recent procedural developments, including an order granting an extension of time for the defendant to respond. This indicates active litigation with deadlines being adjusted to accommodate parties’ needs. The extension suggests ongoing negotiation or

• Filed

DISH Purchasing Corporation et al v. SMK Electronics Corporation, U.S.A. is a civil case currently referred to a magistrate judge. This referral typically involves handling pretrial matters such as discovery disputes, settlement discussions, or other procedural issues to facilitate efficient case management. The

• Filed

Altayeb v. Guardian is a civil case with minimal publicly available information regarding substantive claims or legal issues. The case record references technical or procedural functions related to case management, such as setting or clearing flags, which do not provide insight into the underlying dispute. The absence

• Filed

Basalt Real Estate, LLC v. Silverpeak Corp. et al is a civil litigation matter involving parties likely engaged in real estate or corporate disputes. The case is currently active, with recent procedural developments noted through a minute order, though specific claims or allegations remain undisclosed. The lack of

• Filed

Civil case currently marked active.

• Filed

Dees (PS) v. Weiser et al, docket 25-cv-01680, is a civil case where the plaintiff filed a motion to appoint pro bono counsel. The court issued an order on this motion, reflecting judicial involvement in managing legal representation. Specific claims and case facts remain undisclosed.

• Filed

Rosenfeld et al v. University of Colorado et al, docket 25-cv-00107, is an active civil case involving multiple plaintiffs and the university. A recent memorandum was filed, though its content is unspecified, it may address substantive or procedural issues in the litigation.

• Filed

Aigbekaen (PS) v. USA, docket 26-cv-00902, is a civil case involving a dispute against the United States government. The docket reflects that a judgment has been entered by the clerk, though details about the judgment or underlying claims are not available.

• Filed

Strege (PS) v. Colorado Courts et al, docket 26-cv-00417, is a civil case where the court recently granted an extension of time to file certain documents. This procedural development indicates ongoing case management but does not reveal the nature of the claims or factual background.

• Filed

F.C. et al v. Jacobs Solutions Inc. et al, docket 23-cv-02660, is a civil case involving multiple plaintiffs and defendants. Recent docket activity shows addition and termination of parties, indicating shifting litigation dynamics possibly related to claims or defenses. Specific allegations or factual context have not

• Filed

Walker v. Foreman, docket 25-cv-04018, is a civil case currently referred to a magistrate judge. This referral typically involves pretrial management tasks such as resolving discovery disputes or facilitating settlement discussions. No substantive details about the parties or claims have been disclosed.