Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

USA v. Sartor, docket 26-cr-20188 in the Southern District of Florida, has no recent docket activity reported. The case remains open but without new filings or motions, suggesting a pause or early stage in litigation.

Southern District of Florida

USA v. Sealed Search Warrant and Application for a Warrant by Telephone or Other Reliable Electronic Means is a miscellaneous matter before the Southern District of Florida, docket 26-mj-06237. The filing involves warrants and related orders under magistrate judge supervision.

Southern District of Florida

USA v. Graham, Southern District of Florida docket 26-cr-60125, includes an indictment filed against the defendant. This marks the formal charging stage in the criminal case and initiates prosecution.

Southern District of Florida

Feltzin v. LHP Investments LLC et al in the Southern District of Florida, docket 26-cv-60467, shows a notice of settlement filed by counsel. This suggests the parties have reached an agreement to resolve the dispute without further litigation.

Southern District of Florida

USA v. Carpman in the Southern District of Florida, docket 23-cr-20175, includes notification that a transcript has been filed in the district court. This indicates that court proceedings have occurred and the record is now available for review or appeal.

Southern District of Florida

Zhejiang Julu Industry and Trade Development Co., Ltd v. MBR Dynamic Parts Corp. is active in the Southern District of Florida, docket 26-cv-23336. There are no recent docket entries or filings to indicate progress or dispute resolution.

Southern District of Florida

Parker v. B.W. Boatworks, Inc. et al is a civil case pending in the Southern District of Florida under docket 25-cv-24302. No recent filings or substantive updates are available, suggesting the case may be in early stages or awaiting further activity.

Southern District of Florida

USA v. Rosenthal in the Southern District of Florida, docket 06-cr-20763, includes a notice of attorney appearance for the defendant. This filing marks a formal step in the criminal proceedings, confirming legal representation for the accused.

Northern District of Illinois

Cruz initiated a civil case against Klich in the Northern District of Illinois, docket 24-cv-04771. No recent docket updates are available, indicating early or routine procedural posture.

Northern District of Illinois

Vaughn sued Central Transport LLC in the Northern District of Illinois under docket 26-cv-50195. The case has no recent summary updates but likely involves a civil dispute, possibly related to transportation or employment.

Northern District of Illinois

The United States prosecuted Carrazco-Martinez and co-defendants in the Northern District of Illinois. The criminal docket 19-cr-00351 lists miscellaneous relief motions, signaling ongoing procedural or evidentiary disputes.

Northern District of California

In Dawod et al v. Bondi et al, the Northern District of California docket 24-cv-03731 shows that summons and affidavit have been returned executed as to the USA defendants. This indicates that the government defendants have been formally served and the case is moving forward on procedural grounds.

Southern District of Florida

Ofer v. State of Florida involves a procedural update where the plaintiff or counsel filed a notice of change of address, email, or law firm name. The case remains active in the Southern District of Florida under docket 26-cv-23323, but no substantive motions or rulings are reported in this filing.

District of Columbia

Arnold brought a civil action against McCumber and others in the District of Columbia. The docket 25-cv-04264 shows recent activity concerning attorney fees, indicating post-judgment or settlement proceedings.

Southern District of Florida

Ruiz-Ojeda filed suit against Krome North Service Processing Center in the Southern District of Florida. The case is at an early stage with a recent judge assignment noted on docket 26-cv-21670.

District of Columbia

San Gabriel Valley Medical Center v. Becerra in the District of Columbia shows active case management with deadlines set or reset. The case involves a medical center plaintiff against a defendant named Becerra, possibly a government official. The docket does not specify claims or legal issues but indicates ongoing

District of New Jersey

Bornstein v. Snow Creek LLC in the District of New Jersey shows a duplicate docket entry with no substantive case details. The available information is limited to a text order, leaving the case status and legal issues unclear. The duplication may reflect administrative docket management.

District of New Jersey

In Preza et al. v. Broad Financial LLC, the District of New Jersey admitted pro hac vice counsel, allowing an out-of-state attorney to represent the plaintiffs. This procedural development signals active litigation but does not reveal substantive claims or issues. The case involves financial services defendants.

District of Columbia

Dubose v. Catholic University of America is a civil case in the District of Columbia with no substantive updates available. The case likely involves claims related to education, employment, or civil rights given the university defendant, but the docket provides no further details. The litigation status and issues

District of Columbia

The District of Columbia court granted a motion for leave to file in Howard v. George Washington University. This procedural order allows the plaintiff to submit additional pleadings or amendments, potentially expanding or clarifying claims. The involvement of a university suggests the case may involve educational or