Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

James A. Chaney sued Wal-Mart Stores East LP in the Southern District of Florida. The case details and claims remain undisclosed, limiting understanding of the dispute's nature or scope.

Central District of California

In the Central District of California, parties Kerimova and Palluconi agreed on the selection of a panel mediator. This stipulation indicates progress toward alternative dispute resolution.

District of New Jersey

Latanya Williams filed a civil lawsuit against Melkam INC. in the District of New Jersey. The case lacks detailed filings or information on allegations, limiting insight into its significance or potential impact.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey court issued an order on a motion for leave to file in Holmes v. Progressive Universal Insurance Company. The order represents a procedural step, but details on the motion or court reasoning are unavailable.

District of Colorado

Citibank N.A. initiated a civil action against Gisby in the District of Colorado. Public information on claims or procedural posture is lacking. The dispute may involve financial or contractual issues but remains unspecified.

Eastern District of Texas

Mayne Pharma LLC filed suit against TherapeuticsMD, Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas. The case is in early case management stages. Specific allegations or claims have not been disclosed.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey court ruled on a motion for a protective order in Ortiz v. JBS Carriers, Inc. The order addresses discovery disputes or confidentiality concerns. The case remains in pretrial, with discovery parameters under negotiation.

Northern District of California

Jason Ray Clark filed a lawsuit against Michael Ray Trisler and others in the Northern District of California. The court issued an initial order, marking the case's early procedural stage. Details on claims or defenses remain unavailable.

Central District of California

In Smith v. Puig, the Central District of California court is reviewing a proposed order related to ongoing motions or requests. The case remains active, but no substantive details about the claims or legal issues have been disclosed.

District of Delaware

The plaintiff's attorney filed a motion to withdraw in Underwood v. Jefferson Center For Mental Health, a civil case in the District of Delaware. This procedural change could disrupt the plaintiff's ability to pursue the case and may delay proceedings depending on the court's decision.

District of New Jersey

The National Retirement Fund v. Safran SA, docket 24-cv-09902 in the District of New Jersey, includes a status report filed by the parties. The report likely updates the court on case progress or pending issues. No substantive details on claims or motions are available from the docket entry.

Central District of California

Hartman case, docket 25-cv-09816 in the Central District of California, involves procedural updates including the addition and termination of parties. These changes may affect case scope and strategy. The docket does not provide details on the underlying dispute or claims.

Southern District of New York

McMahon v. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest et al, docket 25-cv-05121 in the Southern District of New York, is an appellate civil case. The parties agreed on a stipulation reflected in a court order, indicating resolution of certain procedural or substantive issues. The dispute likely involves insurance

Southern District of New York

Levi Strauss & Co. filed a civil lawsuit against Rails International, LLC in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-09175. The parties submitted a stipulation without a proposed order, reflecting ongoing procedural negotiations. The docket does not reveal substantive claims or issues at this stage.

Central District of California

Janssen Biotech, Inc. and others filed a civil lawsuit against Accord BioPharma, Inc. and others in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-00222. Defendants have been formally served, allowing the case to proceed to responsive pleadings and discovery. The case involves commercial parties likely disputing

Southern District of New York

Maldonado v. Prairie Properties, L.P., docket 26-cv-01971 in the Southern District of New York, is a newly filed civil case. The plaintiff initiated the suit with a summons served on the defendant. The dispute likely involves property or landlord-tenant issues, though specific claims have not been disclosed.

Southern District of New York

Pechanga Band of Indians v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. et al, docket 25-cv-03605 in the Southern District of New York, is a civil case involving ongoing motion practice. The Pechanga Band of Indians filed a motion reply, indicating active litigation and contested procedural or substantive issues. Specific claims remain

Western District of Washington

Jimenez v. 714 Realty NY, LLC et al, docket 25-cv-01994 in the Western District of Washington, involves a civil dispute with recent procedural activity including a request to adjourn a conference. The docket does not specify the claims or legal issues involved. The case remains in the pretrial phase.

Northern District of California

Soto v. Marshall Dennehey et al, docket 26-cv-02813 in the Northern District of California, is a civil case in its initial phase. The plaintiff has filed a notice of appearance, signaling the start of formal legal representation. The docket does not reveal the nature of the claims or any substantive motions.

Southern District of New York

Adams v. Elliot et al, docket 25-cv-00174 in the Southern District of New York, is a civil case currently at an early procedural stage. The latest docket entry concerns a notice of mailing, reflecting routine court communications rather than substantive litigation activity. The case lacks publicly available details on