Browse Cases

Central District of California

The Central District of California appointed a substitute attorney in Scales v. PEAK6 Investments LLC, docket 25-cv-07538. This procedural step indicates ongoing litigation and a change in legal representation. No substantive rulings or case details are available.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois issued an order on a motion to stay in Zhao v. Laboratory Corporation, docket 24-cv-04040. The order addresses whether to pause proceedings pending further developments. Details on the motion's grounds or the court's ruling are not provided.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois filed a transcript in Ring v. BNP Paribas, docket 23-cv-05552. The transcript records court proceedings and evidence, serving as an official record for litigation and potential appeals. This filing reflects ongoing civil litigation activity.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York denied a transfer request in Kyle Johnson v. ADT LLC, docket 26-cv-03201, keeping the case related to CV-34. The court maintained jurisdiction to preserve case consistency. No substantive details about the claims or defenses have been disclosed.

Southern District of New York

Forrest filed suit against MidValley Family Practice, P.C. in the Southern District of New York, docket 26-cv-01563. The case appears to involve medical or professional liability claims. The litigation is in its early procedural stages with no substantive rulings or detailed allegations available.

Northern District of Illinois

In Unbeatablesale.com v. LJM Supplies, docket 25-cv-05389, the Northern District of Illinois approved a joint discovery plan. The plan governs the exchange of evidence between the parties, indicating the case is in the discovery phase. The dispute likely involves commercial or contractual issues between the companies.

Central District of California

The Central District of California issued summonses in a duplicate filing of Plotkin v. National Credit Union Administration et al, docket 26-cv-03861. The duplication involves the same parties and reflects initial procedural steps. The case likely concerns federal credit union regulation or administrative law issues.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York referred a motion for judicial review in Hyland v. Gogo Inc., docket 25-cv-00483. The referral aims to streamline the court's consideration of the motion within the civil case. No substantive information about the motion's content or the underlying claims is currently available.

Southern District of New York

In Smith v. DJI Technology Inc., docket 25-cv-09941, the Southern District of New York recorded the pro hac vice appearance of out-of-state counsel for the plaintiffs. This procedural filing allows the attorney to represent the plaintiffs in this matter. No details about the underlying claims or dispute have been

Central District of California

The Central District of California granted an extension of time for the Edlow defendants to answer the complaint in Soltani v. Edlow et al, docket 25-cv-02714. The court's order ensures the defendants have additional time to respond while maintaining procedural fairness and adherence to court deadlines. No substantive

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois granted an extension for filing responses in Anderson v. Steiner, docket number 23-cv-15585. The extension provides the defendant additional time to prepare replies in this civil lawsuit. The case continues under active procedural scheduling.

District of Columbia

Devine moved to reset deadlines in a civil case against the Department of the Treasury in the District of Columbia, docket number 26-cv-14039. The motion seeks to adjust the schedule for filings and responses, indicating ongoing case management negotiations. The case involves federal defendants.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York granted a motion to extend the filing deadline in Porter v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., docket number 25-cv-10638. The extension allows additional time to prepare responses or replies in this civil litigation. The case remains in active procedural management.

District of Columbia

An amended complaint was filed in the In re Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation in the District of Columbia, docket number 25-cv-04177. The amendment refines or expands allegations of securities fraud or misrepresentation. The case remains active with evolving claims against the defendant.

Southern District of New York

Elkins joined multidistrict litigation against Monsanto Company in the Southern District of New York, docket number 26-cv-03196. The MDL consolidates related claims for coordinated pretrial proceedings, aiming to streamline discovery and rulings. Elkins' case is now part of this centralized litigation effort.

Southern District of New York

Democracy Forward Foundation sued the U.S. Election Assistance Commission in the Southern District of New York, docket number 26-cv-01271. The lawsuit involves election administration or oversight issues. A certificate disclosing corporate affiliations and financial interests was filed, complying with procedural

District of Columbia

In Robertson v. Martinez, a criminal case in the District of Columbia, docket number 25-cv-03771, a payment record was filed. The record likely relates to financial obligations or transactions relevant to the criminal proceedings. Details on the payment's role or impact on the case remain unspecified.

Southern District of New York

Peerally filed a disclosure of interested entities under Rule 7.1 in the Southern District of New York, docket number 26-cv-03167. This procedural filing identifies corporate affiliations and potential conflicts of interest. It does not address substantive claims but ensures transparency in case management.

Southern District of New York

Curcio filed an appeal against Collectors Universe Inc in the Southern District of New York, docket number 26-cv-01226. The case involves procedural motions related to removal and transfer, indicating jurisdictional or venue disputes early in the litigation. The appeal suggests ongoing contest over proper forum or

District of New Jersey

Winbush filed a civil complaint against L'Oreal USA in the District of New Jersey, initiating a lawsuit under docket number 26-cv-04153. The complaint marks the start of litigation, but specific allegations remain undisclosed at this stage. The case is in its early procedural phase with no substantive rulings yet.