Browse Cases

District of Massachusetts

In Doe v. Children’s Hospital Corporation, docket 25-cv-10343 in the District of Massachusetts, the court issued an order on a motion for leave to file excess pages. This procedural ruling addresses document length limits without substantive case details.

District of Massachusetts

In Amoson et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., docket 22-cv-11963 in the District of Massachusetts, a reply to a response to a motion was filed. This continues procedural briefing but does not reveal substantive case details.

District of Massachusetts

In Pimentel v. City of Lawrence, Massachusetts, docket 26-cv-11602 in the District of Massachusetts, a waiver of service was executed. This procedural step allows the defendant to respond without formal service of process.

Central District of California

In the criminal case against Loudy, docket 24-po-00019 in the Central District of California, the United States filed CVB-related documents. These filings likely relate to evidentiary or procedural matters in the prosecution, which is in early or mid stages.

District of Massachusetts

In FWK Holdings LLC et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al, docket 21-cv-11057 in the District of Massachusetts, the parties filed a stipulation. This agreement addresses procedural or substantive matters, though details of the stipulation and underlying dispute are not disclosed.

District of Massachusetts

In National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A. v. Ortega et al, docket 24-cv-40039 in the District of Massachusetts, the court dismissed the case following a settlement. The dismissal formally ends litigation between the insurer and defendants without trial.

District of Massachusetts

In Tajgardoun v. Hyde, docket 26-cv-11417 in the District of Massachusetts, the court received a response to a habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petition challenges the legality of Tajgardoun's detention, and the response addresses the constitutional claims raised.

Central District of California

In Kenneth S. Grossman v. David Sin et al, docket 23-cv-09501 in the Central District of California, the plaintiff filed a notice of motion. This filing requests judicial intervention on an unspecified issue in the ongoing civil case involving multiple defendants.

District of Massachusetts

In Page v. Chicago Housing Authority, docket 25-cv-13850 in the District of Massachusetts, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The amendment updates or clarifies the original claims against the Chicago Housing Authority, though specific allegations remain undisclosed.

Central District of California

In Fernandez v. Riverview Flats, LLC, docket 25-cv-08814 in the Central District of California, counsel filed a notice of appearance. This procedural filing confirms formal legal representation for a party in the case.

District of Massachusetts

Sabey et al filed a notice of appeal against Butterfield et al in the District of Massachusetts, docket 23-cv-10957. The case is now in the appellate stage, challenging a prior court decision.

District of Massachusetts

Doe filed a case against Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the District of Massachusetts, docket 23-cv-11490. Recent activity is limited to procedural notices without substantive developments.

District of Massachusetts

Tom Hussey Photography, LLC sued Swan Brook, Inc. in the District of Massachusetts, docket 25-cv-11763. The dispute likely involves photography services or intellectual property. A scheduled hearing was cancelled recently.

District of Massachusetts

In Leary v. Great American Insurance Company et al, District of Massachusetts docket 26-cv-11374, summons were issued to defendants, initiating formal legal proceedings. No substantive developments beyond the summons issuance are reported.

District of Massachusetts

In P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corp. v. South Middlesex Opportunity Council, Inc., District of Massachusetts docket 25-cv-13396, a counterclaim was filed. The case remains in active civil litigation with contested claims between the parties.

District of Massachusetts

In Glattly et al v. Hecht, District of Massachusetts docket 24-cv-12102, counsel formally entered the case through a notice of appearance. This procedural step marks the start of active legal representation without substantive motions yet.

Central District of California

The Central District of California dismissed Staci L. Starbuck's civil case against Hawai'i Moving Pros and others, docket 25-cv-11377. The case involved consumer or service-related claims and ended before trial through dismissal.

District of Massachusetts

Lloyd filed a civil suit against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others in the District of Massachusetts, docket 26-cv-11451. Recent docket activity includes a memorandum supporting a motion, indicating active litigation and possible dispositive or procedural motions.

District of Massachusetts

Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Company sued Marley Engineered Products, LLC in the District of Massachusetts, docket 26-cv-11618. The litigation likely involves insurance coverage or liability related to fire insurance, with recent filings including a corporate disclosure statement.

Central District of California

Andrew Kimmel filed a civil lawsuit against Ranker, Inc. in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cv-11320. The case is in its early stages, with a scheduling notice issued to set future proceedings.