Browse Cases

A miscellaneous relief filing suggests a request for court action outside standard motions. The lack of specifics prevents identification of the relief sought or its impact on the case.

Judge Malachy E. Mannion issued a memorandum addressing Wagner Industries, Inc.'s motion to dismiss. The memorandum precedes a formal order expected to be filed separately. The motion challenges the legal sufficiency of the claims against Wagner Industries, seeking dismissal of the case at an early stage.

An attorney fee election form has been filed, likely reflecting a choice regarding fee arrangements or disclosures. The note warns against combining this event with others, implying procedural importance.

HARTFORD — In the eyes of the law in Connecticut, Stefon Morant and Scott Lewis are innocent men. The pair — who both spent close to 20 years in prison for a 1990 double murder they did not commit — were eventually exonerated and released after evidence emerged that the lead detective in the case coerced witnesses to

The case was designated for electronic case filing (ECF) following its transfer from the Southern District of New York. This designation requires all future filings to be submitted electronically, ensuring compliance with court technology standards and helping case management.

The case was assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer following its transfer from the Southern District of New York. The notice advises parties to review the judge's individual practices and electronic case filing rules. This assignment marks the formal judicial oversight and management of the case.

Civil case currently marked active.

Civil case currently marked active.

***Pursuant to the 9 Stipulation/Order of transfer, answer due date updated for Medical Answering Services, LLC. Answer due 5/5/2026. (amt)

G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 TELEPHONE Conference set for 6/25/2026 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Carla B. Freedman. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 6/18/2026. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures

Southern District of Florida

Civil case in S.D. Fla. currently marked active.

The case was electronically transferred from the Southern District of New York to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. This transfer changes the venue and may affect case scheduling, local rules, and judicial assignment. The transfer was completed on April 14, 2026.

Medical Answering Services, LLC filed a Rule 7.1 corporate disclosure statement confirming it has no corporate parent. This disclosure complies with federal rules requiring transparency about corporate affiliations. The filing was made after the case transfer from the Southern District of New York.

District of New Jersey

The United States is prosecuting Zarate and co-defendants in a criminal matter, docket 25-cr-00809. The court granted a motion to continue at docket entry 33, pushing back a scheduled proceeding. The multi-defendant structure and continuance suggest active pretrial litigation — likely involving discovery disputes

Northern District of California

In case 26-cv-01114, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) and other plaintiffs have filed a memorandum opposing a motion brought by former President Trump and associated parties. The filing indicates ongoing active litigation with contested procedural or substantive issues between the political entities

Western District of Washington

USA vs. Castillovictorino, docket number 26-po-05511, is currently in the early procedural stages with limited publicly available information. Hearings have been scheduled, but no substantive details about the charges or claims have been disclosed, leaving the nature of the alleged offense unclear.

Civil case currently marked active.

Civil case currently marked active.

The trial involving Elon Musk and OpenAI is now in its second week. Specific details regarding the proceedings or the core allegations remain undisclosed. The case centers on Musk's claims against the artificial intelligence company he co-founded.

Maryland prosecutors face accusations of withholding evidence. This practice can compromise fair trial rights. It risks undermining the justice system's integrity. Public trust can also erode when evidence is not disclosed.