Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

Plaintiffs filed a reply in support of a motion in Ruddie et al v. BE MARKETING LLC et al, docket number 26-cv-20962, Southern District of Florida. This filing advances procedural arguments without disclosed substantive details about the dispute.

Southern District of Florida

The court issued a dismissal order in Deras v. MSC Cruise Management (UK) Ltd. et al, docket number 24-cv-25015, in the Southern District of Florida. The dismissal resolves the case or a party's claims without disclosed reasons or trial.

Southern District of Florida

A hearing was scheduled in Braido v. Disaronno Ingredients LLC et al, docket number 26-cv-21336, in the Southern District of Florida. The scheduling reflects ongoing procedural management without detailed information on the underlying claims.

Southern District of Florida

A procedural notice was filed in Shuman v. Windsor of Coconut Creek, LLC et al, docket number 26-cv-60472, in the Southern District of Florida. The case remains pending with no disclosed substantive developments.

Southern District of Florida

New counsel entered an appearance in Adams v. Henien, docket number 24-cv-62444, in the Southern District of Florida. This procedural update signals a change in legal representation for one party without further substantive details.

Southern District of Florida

The Southern District of Florida referred Gonzalez v. ABE NG 2334 PONCE LAND TRUST et al, docket number 26-cv-22527, to a magistrate judge. This referral helps preliminary case management, including discovery and settlement discussions.

Southern District of Florida

Aleman and other plaintiffs continue litigation against David Green, D.D.S., P.A. in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 25-cv-80713. The case involves ongoing filings likely related to professional or contractual disputes involving the dental practice.

Southern District of Florida

The United States Court of Appeals acknowledged receipt of the appeal in Secret Consulting, Inc. v. Fotohabadi et al, Southern District of Florida, docket number 24-cv-81591. This marks procedural progress in the appellate process without disclosed substantive details.

Southern District of Florida

Multiphone Latin America, Inc. initiated a dispute against Millicom International Cellular S.A. in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 25-cv-23249. The case involves procedural activity but lacks detailed information on the substantive claims.

Southern District of Florida

Doe filed a notice of appeal against the City of Coconut Creek in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 25-cv-60352. This filing moves the case to a higher court for review of a prior decision.

A summons was issued to Ameriquest Mortgage Company, and counsel was notified for service on May 16, 2007. The case details, including court and docket number, remain unspecified. No further information on claims or parties is available.

Southern District of Florida

Bell v. Cedars Business Services, LLC, Southern District of Florida case 26-cv-60915, shows a notice of attorney appearance filed. Legal representation has been formally entered for one party. No substantive claims or procedural details are available in the docket.

Southern District of Florida

Curtis v. Gavagni, Southern District of Florida case 26-cv-22317, involves a civil dispute with pro bono legal assistance through a Volunteer Attorney Program. The docket does not provide details on claims or defenses. The case is pending in federal court.

Southern District of Florida

Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Walton et al, Southern District of Florida case 26-cv-80080, records a notice of attorney appearance. Legal counsel has formally entered the case for one party. The docket does not reveal claims, facts, or procedural posture beyond this representation.

Southern District of Florida

Oceguera Cardentey v. Parra et al, Southern District of Florida case 26-cv-21522, includes a status report filed by the plaintiff. The report signals ongoing procedural developments but does not provide details on the claims or factual background. The case remains active in litigation.

Southern District of Florida

Moore v. Arrindel et al, Southern District of Florida case 26-cv-22009, involves a procedural order issued by the court. The order reflects active case management but does not disclose substantive claims or allegations. The case appears to be in early or intermediate procedural stages.

Southern District of Florida

Pinder v. Zamet et al, Southern District of Florida case 26-cv-20058, features a court order setting a status conference. The conference aims to assess case progress and manage litigation steps. The underlying claims and parties' positions are not detailed in the docket.

Southern District of Florida

Fortis I, LLC v. 615 Ventures, LLC, Southern District of Florida case 24-cv-24211, shows a motion for extension of time filed by the parties. The case involves a business dispute but lacks detailed claims or factual background in the record. The extension request indicates ongoing procedural developments.

Southern District of Florida

Dos Anjos v. Colette 4 Inc. et al, Southern District of Florida case 25-cv-62274, involves court activity focused on scheduling and deadline adjustments. The docket reflects procedural management to control the pace of litigation. No substantive claims or factual details are provided.

Southern District of Florida

In Bosmans v. General Electric Company et al, Southern District of Florida case 26-cv-20803, the parties requested an extension of time to meet court deadlines. The motion indicates ongoing procedural activity but does not reveal substantive claims or issues in the dispute. The extension likely aims to allow