Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

Plaintiffs Brouillette and others filed an attorney appearance in their suit against Guardian Fleet Services, Inc. in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 26-cv-80125. The filing indicates active legal representation and progression in the case, though substantive claims are not disclosed.

Southern District of Florida

The court dismissed or closed the case Nelson, Mitchell v. Miami FCI in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 26-cv-20617. The dismissal ends the litigation or the involvement of certain parties, though specific claims and reasons for dismissal are not detailed.

Southern District of Florida

Ortiz filed an opposition to a motion by the City of West Palm Beach in a civil suit, docket number 26-cv-80042. The case involves claims against the city and possibly other defendants, with ongoing procedural disputes reflected in the contested motion filings.

Southern District of Florida

In McDowell v. Stryker Corporation, docket number 26-cv-60816, the plaintiff opposed a motion filed by Stryker Corporation. The opposition reflects contested procedural or substantive issues in ongoing civil litigation between the parties.

Southern District of Florida

Nikolaeva and North Restaurants LLC filed a stipulation of dismissal in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 25-cv-23023. The parties agreed to end the litigation, indicating a settlement or resolution without further court intervention.

Southern District of Florida

Silva Rodriguez challenged an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) bond determination in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 26-cv-60856. The case focuses on the plaintiff's request for bond pending immigration proceedings and contests ICE's discretion in bond decisions and procedural protections.

District of New Jersey

Plaintiffs sued the City of Englewood, New Jersey, and other defendants in a civil rights case, docket number 22-cv-05585. The court issued an order documented in docket entry 43, but specific claims and details remain undisclosed. The dispute likely involves municipal actions affecting plaintiffs' rights.

District of New Jersey

In John Doe v. New Jersey State Prison, docket number 24-cv-08290, the court granted an extension for the defendants to answer the complaint. The order addresses procedural timing without resolving any substantive issues at this stage of the litigation.

District of New Jersey

Plaintiffs filed suit against the Bernards Township Board of Education and related parties in the District of New Jersey, docket number 25-cv-16757. The case involves a letter submitted to the court, indicating ongoing procedural or substantive matters, likely related to education administration or policy disputes.

Eastern District of Texas

Howard sued the Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division in the Eastern District of Texas, docket number 13-cv-00256. The case record currently shows only procedural activity, including a notice of mailing, with no substantive claims or rulings disclosed.

Southern District of Florida

Universal Fire & Casualty Insurance Company sued Prieto Brother's Corporation and others in the Southern District of Florida, docket 25-cv-22772. The defendants have not been served due to an unexecuted summons affidavit, delaying case progress. The nature of the dispute is not detailed.

Central District of California

Disney Enterprises, Inc. and others initiated a lawsuit against Minimax and others in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-08768. The case is in early stages with a scheduling notice issued to establish timelines and deadlines. Specific claims have not been disclosed.

Central District of California

Xiangshan Zhang sued Vivosun Inc. in the Central District of California, docket 22-cv-01947. The court issued an order related to the case, but no details on claims or facts are available. The case involves a civil dispute with limited public information on its substance or procedural posture.

Central District of California

Genexa Inc. and KinderFarms LLC are engaged in ongoing litigation in the Central District of California, docket 23-cv-08378. The parties filed a status report reflecting procedural progress. The dispute likely involves commercial issues, but factual and claim details are not provided.

Central District of California

Ivory Paynes filed suit against Devante McCreary in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-11582. The case is in early stages with only in-chambers procedural orders issued. No hearings or trials have occurred, and substantive claims are not detailed.

District of New Jersey

Plaintiff Johnson sued Boardwalk Regency LLC doing business as Caesars Atlantic City and others in the District of New Jersey, docket 23-cv-23232. The case is active with procedural developments including a proposed order, but factual and claim details are not available.

District of New Jersey

Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company sued Broan-Nutone, LLC and others in the District of New Jersey, docket 23-cv-21262. The case currently focuses on procedural matters such as scheduling and hearings. No substantive claims or factual details have been disclosed.

District of New Jersey

Castillo filed suit against New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. in the District of New Jersey, docket 24-cv-08296. The dispute arises from transit operations or conduct, though specific facts are not provided. The case is active, with recent procedural filings indicating ongoing litigation.

District of New Jersey

Commscope, Inc. sued Rosenberger Technology Kunshan Co., Ltd. and others in the District of New Jersey, docket 19-cv-15962, over a commercial dispute. The case involves complex business issues, possibly intellectual property or contract-related. The court issued document 747 reflecting ongoing case management, but

District of New Jersey

Plaintiff Kupan voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit against AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals in the District of New Jersey under docket 19-cv-01292. The dismissal was by stipulation, indicating the parties agreed to end the litigation without further court action. The underlying claims and facts remain undisclosed.