Northern District of Illinois
USA v. Montgomery et al, Northern District of Illinois docket 22-cr-00576, recorded termination of hearings. This may indicate resolution of pretrial matters or case progression toward trial or disposition.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
46685 cases tracked · 46685 currently active
Showing 20 of 46685 matching cases
Northern District of Illinois
USA v. Montgomery et al, Northern District of Illinois docket 22-cr-00576, recorded termination of hearings. This may indicate resolution of pretrial matters or case progression toward trial or disposition.
Northern District of Illinois
Hazelwood v. Mowobi et al, Northern District of Illinois docket 26-cv-05456, granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This allows the plaintiff to litigate without paying court fees due to financial hardship.
Northern District of Illinois
USA v. Griffin, Northern District of Illinois docket 19-cr-00506, includes an order on a motion for miscellaneous relief. This indicates ongoing procedural or substantive motions in the criminal case.
Northern District of Illinois
Johnson v. Irizarry et al, Northern District of Illinois docket 24-cv-10874, shows a recent extension of time order. This affects the schedule for pleadings or discovery.
Northern District of Illinois
Katz v. Allied First Bank, SB, Northern District of Illinois docket 22-cv-05277, recorded an extension of time granted. This procedural order likely affects deadlines for filings or responses.
Northern District of Illinois
Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC sued Waukegan Illinois Hospital Company, LLC in the Northern District of Illinois. The case likely involves a business dispute, possibly contract-related, between healthcare service providers. The docket lacks detailed entries, indicating early procedural posture.
Southern District of Florida
Plaintiff Favors filed a civil suit against Sunmark Products by McKesson in the Southern District of Florida. The docket shows a notice of change of address or law firm name, indicating counsel updates. The case likely involves product liability or commercial claims given the defendant’s profile.
Southern District of Florida
Plaintiff Medina sued Dolphin Encounters Ltd., a foreign corporation, and others in the Southern District of Florida. The case likely involves claims against a corporate defendant, possibly related to personal injury, contract, or business disputes. The docket contains no detailed entries, suggesting early procedural
Southern District of Florida
The United States filed a disclosure of the presentence investigation report and plea and sentencing report for defendant Jovan Maurice Walker in the Southern District of Florida. This reflects post-plea proceedings in a criminal case, likely preceding sentencing. The docket shows routine case management activity.
Southern District of Florida
The United States obtained a sealed search warrant in the Southern District of Florida. The docket reflects magistrate judge activity related to warrants and applications. This warrant likely authorizes law enforcement to search premises or electronic devices as part of a criminal investigation.
Southern District of Florida
Plaintiffs Brombacher and others sued the City of West Palm Beach, a Florida municipal corporation, in federal court. The case likely involves claims against the city government, possibly related to civil rights, municipal liability, or local government actions. The docket lacks detailed entries, indicating early or
Southern District of Florida
Gucci America, Inc. filed a civil suit against Dawify-yu.com in the Southern District of Florida, likely involving intellectual property claims. The docket entry notes a notice filed by the court, possibly related to case management or procedural matters. The case involves a luxury brand protecting its trademarks or
Southern District of Florida
The United States sought a pen register and trap and trace device order targeting a WhatsApp LLC account in the Southern District of Florida. The magistrate judge docket shows processing of warrants and applications related to electronic surveillance. This reflects efforts to collect communication metadata in a
Southern District of Florida
The United States government obtained a sealed pen register and trap and trace device order in the Southern District of Florida. The order authorizes the collection of electronic metadata from a target under investigation. The docket reflects routine magistrate judge activity related to warrants and applications.
Southern District of Florida
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC filed a copyright infringement suit against an anonymous defendant identified as Doe in the Southern District of Florida. The case involves allegations of unauthorized distribution of copyrighted adult content. The parties have recently filed a notice of settlement, indicating resolution before
District of New Jersey
Lucas v. Solix Inc., docket 25-cv-14001 in the District of New Jersey, is a duplicate filing matching a prior case. The entry references a proposed order but provides no additional substantive information.
District of New Jersey
Disability Rights New Jersey sued Adelman and others in the District of New Jersey, docket 24-cv-00949. The case likely involves disability rights issues, but no further details on claims or procedural status are available.
District of New Jersey
MA filed suit against ICANCERHELP Inc. and others in the District of New Jersey, docket 26-cv-01568. The defendants face an approaching deadline to answer the complaint, indicating the case is in its initial phase without disclosed claim details.
District of New Jersey
The District of New Jersey recorded a judicial preference notice in ST Liberty LLC v. M/Y Mesmerized, docket 26-cv-03806. This entry duplicates a prior filing and reflects ongoing case management efforts without substantive updates.
District of New Jersey
In Alvarez v. Hines, docket 26-cv-03810 in the District of New Jersey, the parties have not filed the required diversity disclosure statement. This omission affects the court's ability to confirm federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship.