Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

In Gomez v. 38th Street Cafe LLC, docket 23-cv-01576, the Southern District of New York issued a scheduling order. This order sets deadlines for discovery, motions, and other pretrial activities. The case details are not specified, but the scheduling order establishes the procedural timeline and framework for

Southern District of New York

The Westchester County Fair Housing Board filed suit against Platzner International Group, LTD. and others in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-07905. The case concerns fair housing law violations, likely involving discrimination or improper housing practices. A scheduled conference was adjourned

Southern District of New York

In USA v. Parker, docket 15-cr-00848, the Southern District of New York issued an order identified as document 79. The case involves criminal prosecution by the United States against Parker. Specifics of the order and charges are not disclosed, but the case remains active in the criminal justice process. The order

Southern District of New York

San Antonio Fire and Police Pension Fund sued Dentsply Sirona Inc. and others in the Southern District of New York, docket 22-cv-06339. The case involves unspecified allegations. A recent court order addresses the withdrawal of an attorney for one of the parties, signaling a change in legal representation during

Southern District of New York

The United States Court of Appeals transmitted its mandate to the Southern District of New York in Delaney v. HC2, Inc., docket 24-cv-06287. This procedural step signals the conclusion of appellate review and returns the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the appellate ruling. The

Southern District of New York

Valentine v. Quebec Youth Protection Services (DPG/DYP) et al, docket number 25-cv-05247 in the Southern District of New York, involves a civil action against a youth protection agency. The plaintiff alleges claims related to the agency's conduct, though specific facts are not disclosed. Procedural progress includes

Southern District of New York

In Floyd's of Leadville, Inc. v. Alexander Capital LP et al, docket number 22-cv-03318 in the Southern District of New York, the plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to file a document. This procedural motion relates to case management rather than substantive issues. The underlying dispute details remain

Southern District of New York

Lobbe v. Berryhill, docket number 17-cv-05589 in the Southern District of New York, involves a social security dispute with filings including a letter submitted to the court. The case likely concerns administrative law issues related to Social Security Administration decisions. The litigation continues with procedural

Southern District of New York

In Dixon v. White et al, docket number 25-cv-07883 in the Southern District of New York, the plaintiff filed a Reply Memorandum of Law supporting a motion. This filing indicates active litigation with ongoing substantive legal arguments. The case is progressing through motion practice, although specific claims and

Western District of Washington

The Western District of Washington issued an In Forma Pauperis (IFP) deficiency letter in Littman v. LeadPoint Inc, docket number 26-cv-05324. The court found the plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees incomplete, requiring correction before the case can advance. The litigation remains in its

Central District of California

The U.S. government filed a civil lawsuit against Bytedance Ltd. in the Central District of California. The suit challenges Bytedance's business practices within the United States, though specific allegations are not disclosed.

Central District of California

The federal court in the Central District of California remanded Lindsey Schantz v. General Motors LLC to Superior Court. The remand returns the case to state jurisdiction after prior federal court involvement.

Central District of California

In Wesley Africa v. Vision Path, Inc., the Central District of California docket notes changes in attorney representation. The filing documents additions and terminations of counsel for one or more parties during ongoing litigation.

Central District of California

Plaintiff Michael Brian Smith filed a motion-related declaration in his civil suit against Epson America Inc. in the Central District of California. The declaration supports ongoing litigation but details on the claims remain unspecified.

Western District of Washington

Plaintiff Carrasco filed suit against Suttell & Hammer PS and others in the Western District of Washington. The defendants have been formally served with the summons and complaint, marking the start of the litigation process.

Southern District of New York

In Bartolini v. Town of Yorktown et al, docket number 25-cv-08508, the pro se plaintiff consented to electronic service in the Southern District of New York. The case involves the Town of Yorktown and possibly other defendants. The consent helps procedural communications but does not reveal substantive legal issues or

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York granted an extension for defendants to answer the complaint in Alexander Gomez v. LZ77 LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-10552. The order ensures defendants have additional time to respond, maintaining orderly case management and fairness in the litigation process.

Southern District of New York

Bizelia et al filed claims against Clinton Towers Management in the Southern District of New York, docket number 20-cv-08065. The docket includes a letter filing indicating ongoing procedural communications. The nature of the dispute and claims remain unspecified in the available information.

Southern District of New York

In Thomas v. Doubleday Publishing et al, docket number 25-cv-06454, the Southern District of New York issued a memorandum endorsement. The case involves the plaintiff Thomas against Doubleday Publishing and others, possibly concerning intellectual property or contract issues. The endorsement addresses procedural or

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York issued an order in Eletson Holdings Inc. et al v. Levona Holdings Ltd., docket number 23-cv-07331. The civil case involves claims by Eletson Holdings and others against Levona Holdings Ltd. The order's content and the dispute's specifics are not disclosed in the available summary.