The court issued summonses to defendants identified as partnerships and unincorporated associations on Schedule A. This step formally notifies these defendants of the lawsuit and compels their response. Issuance of summonses triggers deadlines for answering or otherwise responding. The court’s jurisdiction over these
Browse Cases
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
46685 cases tracked · 46651 currently active
Showing 20 of 46685 matching cases
The plaintiff filed an amended complaint or petition to modify the original claims. Amendments may add or remove parties, change allegations, or clarify legal theories. The court must approve the amendment if it occurs after certain deadlines. Amended pleadings can reshape the litigation and affect strategy.
The party filed an objection or opposition to a motion, challenging its merits or procedural basis. This filing aims to persuade the court to deny or modify the motion. It may address factual inaccuracies, legal errors, or procedural defects. The court will weigh these arguments in deciding the motion’s fate.
The party filed a motion to compel, seeking a court order to require the opposing party to produce evidence or comply with discovery obligations. The motion alleges noncompliance or refusal to provide requested information. The court will assess whether the discovery requests are relevant and proportional before
Proof of service was filed to confirm that subsequent documents were properly delivered to all parties. This filing ensures compliance with procedural rules requiring notice of filings. The court relies on proof of service to verify parties received relevant documents. Failure to serve can delay proceedings or
Central District of California
The United States government moved to dismiss a magistrate complaint against Gallegos in the Central District of California, docket 25-mj-06245. The dismissal ends the preliminary criminal proceedings at the magistrate level.
Southern District of New York
Jackson v. Corkcicle, LLC, docket 25-cv-07410 in the Southern District of New York, saw a court order to adjourn a scheduled conference. No further details about the case claims or status were provided.
Southern District of New York
Thorne voluntarily dismissed a case against Aki Holdings, Inc. in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-09976. The dismissal was filed without prejudice, ending the litigation at this stage.
Southern District of New York
Floyd III filed a case against Monaco et al in the Southern District of New York, docket 26-cv-03951. The record includes a Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement but lacks substantive details about the claims or proceedings.
Northern District of Illinois
Seer, Inc. and others initiated litigation against Nanomics Biotechnology Co., Ltd. in the Northern District of Illinois, docket 26-cv-05498. The nature of the dispute has not been provided.
Northern District of Illinois
Rogers et al brought a lawsuit against Amazon.Com, Inc. in the Northern District of Illinois, docket 26-cv-05497. The case details and claims remain undisclosed.
Northern District of Illinois
Shen et al filed a case against Xu et al in the Northern District of Illinois under docket 26-cv-05496. No further details about the claims or procedural posture are available at this time.
The docket entry indicates a termination of a civil case. No further details about the parties, claims, or reasons for termination are provided.
Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley reviewed a Notice of Related Cases and a Motion to Dismiss filed by Respondents. The Court acknowledged jurisdiction over the detained Petitioner, which Respondents did not dispute. Respondents requested dismissal of the Petition as duplicative to promote judicial economy but failed
An 8-minute order was served by mail on Omar Mendoza Caraveo. The order's content and context are not detailed in the record. The service by mail indicates procedural steps in ongoing litigation involving this individual.
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 30 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Wagner Industries, Inc. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/20/2026. (gg)
Civil case currently marked active.
Civil case currently marked active.
Civil case currently marked active.
Civil case currently marked active.