Browse Cases

Northern District of Illinois

In Marcos Arevalo v. Outfront Media LLC, Northern District of Illinois case 26-cv-01682, the court filed a scheduling notice. This informs parties of upcoming court dates and procedural deadlines. No substantive issues are disclosed at this stage.

Northern District of Illinois

Wilkinson filed a motion to terminate various motions in a civil case against Smith County, Texas, Northern District of Illinois docket 24-cv-00243. The motion seeks to close out certain legal proceedings, possibly due to lack of merit or procedural grounds.

Central District of California

Roller Rabbit LLC requested a summons against De Vave Trade in Central District of California case 26-cv-00923. The court issued an In Chambers Order/Directive without holding a proceeding. No further substantive information is available.

Central District of California

Freeman v. Municipality of Princeton, Central District of California case 26-cv-02140, involves a civil suit against a municipality. The complaint details are unspecified, and the case appears to be in early or ongoing stages without further developments noted.

Northern District of Illinois

In Machado-Leon v. Facility Administrator et al, Northern District of Illinois case 26-cv-01518, the court issued a Temporary Restraining Order. This indicates urgent relief was granted to prevent harm or preserve the status quo pending further proceedings. The underlying dispute details are not provided.

Northern District of California

Atlantic Recording Corporation et al v. Anna's Archive et al, Northern District of California case 26-cv-00002, involved a default hearing. This suggests one party failed to respond or appear, potentially leading to a default judgment against that party.

District of Columbia

In Summerville v. Fordham et al, District of Columbia case 26-cv-00033, defendants waived formal service of process. This procedural step allows the case to proceed without delay related to service issues. No substantive details of the dispute are provided.

Northern District of Illinois

Isak et al v. Heath et al, Northern District of Illinois case 25-cv-02628, is managing procedural deadlines including setting or resetting dates. This indicates active litigation with ongoing motions or discovery, though substantive issues are not disclosed.

Northern District of Illinois

In Etienne v. Florida Department of Children and Families et al, Northern District of Illinois case 25-cv-02052, the court granted leave to file a review. The nature of the review and underlying claims remain unspecified, but the case likely involves civil claims against a state agency related to child welfare.

Northern District of Illinois

In Schoenmann et al v. Rund, Northern District of Illinois case 25-cv-08065, the parties submitted a status report to update the court on ongoing procedural developments. The case remains active with no substantive details disclosed in the filing.

District of Colorado

In Henry et al v. Caamano Duarte et al, case 25-cv-04135 in the District of Colorado, the court granted a motion for a magistrate judge. This procedural development advances case management and may expedite resolution.

Central District of California

Service of summons and complaint was executed in Peregrine Data LLC v. Motive Technologies, Inc., case 25-cv-01180 in the Central District of California. This procedural step confirms the defendant has been formally notified, enabling the case to proceed.

Eastern District of Texas

In USA v. Wilson et al, case 17-cr-00028 in the Eastern District of Texas, the defendant filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This motion seeks to waive court fees due to indigency and allows the defendant to continue without financial barriers.

Eastern District of Texas

Simplot AB Retail, Inc. v. Garrett Farms LLC et al involves ongoing multi-district litigation (MDL) proceedings in the Eastern District of Texas, case 24-cv-00059. The case is at a stage requiring further clarification or action within the MDL framework.

Western District of Washington

The Western District of Washington court dismissed Tupou v. Sanudo et al, case 26-cv-01409, by court order. The dismissal ends the case unless appealed or refiled. The grounds for dismissal are unspecified but may involve procedural or substantive deficiencies.

Eastern District of Texas

Vincit, LLC and others filed a supplement in their civil action against Brown et al in the Eastern District of Texas, case 24-cv-00079. The supplement likely adds evidence or argumentation to support the plaintiffs' claims. Specific dispute details are not available.

Northern District of California

In Bianca Garcia v. Freedom Debt Relief, LLC, the plaintiff completed service of summons and complaint within the required 21-day period in the Northern District of California case 26-cv-03077. This step allows the case to proceed to further litigation stages. Details on claims or defenses remain undisclosed.

Central District of California

Ventura v. Tiaranai et al in the Central District of California has a scheduling notice filed, marking the start of procedural steps in case 26-cv-00826. The case remains in early stages with no disclosed claims or party positions.

District of Colorado

The District of Colorado assigned case number 26-cv-01245, signaling early case management activity. No substantive filings or party details have been disclosed at this stage, indicating the case is in its initial procedural phase.

District of Columbia

In Spann v. Krewer et al, the parties filed a motion for an extension of time in the District of Columbia civil case 22-cv-00877. The motion addresses procedural scheduling but lacks details on the court's ruling or the reasons behind the request. The case involves multiple defendants, suggesting complex litigation.