Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

Ritz v. Genius Group Limited et al, docket 25-cv-08761 in the Southern District of New York, is an active civil case with limited public information. No substantive updates or procedural developments are available. The case status remains open without further detail.

Southern District of New York

Curtis et al v. 360 Business Management, Inc. et al, docket 25-cv-03415 in the Southern District of New York, notes receipt of returned mail. This may indicate service or communication issues with parties. The underlying dispute involves Curtis and multiple defendants, but details are limited.

Southern District of New York

Monaco v. Medly Pharmacy, Inc., docket 22-cv-08506 in the Southern District of New York, features a court order on a motion to adjourn a conference. The procedural development indicates ongoing case management. The dispute likely involves claims against Medly Pharmacy, but specifics are unavailable.

Southern District of New York

Ortiz sued Newburgh Enlarged City School District and others in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-06878. The case involves a civil dispute but lacks detailed allegations or procedural updates. The parties remain engaged in litigation without further public details.

Southern District of New York

Teman sued Zeldes Needle Cooper LLP and others in the Southern District of New York, docket 24-cv-09830. No docket activity or claim details are publicly available. The case remains pending without substantive updates.

Southern District of New York

Liz filed a lawsuit against Meatball Management LLC in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-04611. The case is newly filed with no further information on claims or procedural posture available. The nature of the dispute remains undisclosed.

Northern District of Illinois

Miller et al v. Emerson Electric Company, docket 23-cv-03797 in the Northern District of Illinois, includes a court order granting an extension of time. The extension affects deadlines for filings or responses. No substantive claim details are available in the docket summary.

Southern District of New York

Cruz et al v. Progenesis, Inc., docket 26-mc-00098 in the Southern District of New York, is a miscellaneous civil case with a notice filing. The notice likely pertains to procedural updates or case management. No substantive claims or issues are detailed in the docket summary.

Northern District of Illinois

Build Boy Movies LLC filed an amended complaint against YouTube, Inc. and others in the Northern District of Illinois, docket 24-cv-13324. The amendment revises the plaintiff's allegations, likely involving intellectual property or content disputes. The case proceeds with updated claims shaping the litigation scope.

Southern District of New York

Parker v. Ohlerich et al, docket 25-cv-06299 in the Southern District of New York, involves a filing of a mailing receipt. This reflects ongoing procedural steps such as service of process or communication. The nature of the claims or defenses remains undisclosed in the docket summary.

Southern District of New York

Dubinsky v. Alperstein et al, docket 24-cv-10007 in the Southern District of New York, shows routine docket activity with a mailing receipt. This indicates document service or communication between parties or court. No substantive legal developments or issues are reported.

Northern District of Illinois

Gathuru v. Skyline Cargo INC., docket 25-cv-08257 in the Northern District of Illinois, includes a court order on a motion for entry of default. The motion suggests the defendant failed to respond or appear, prompting potential default judgment. This procedural step signals possible defendant noncompliance or dispute

Southern District of New York

Fixin Chips BH LLC v. E. Mishan & Sons Inc., docket 25-cv-03865 in the Southern District of New York, involves a court order on a motion for extension of time. The order addresses deadlines for filings or responses, indicating ongoing case management. No substantive dispute details are available.

Northern District of Illinois

Nellessen v. Mershon et al, docket 25-cv-50106 in the Northern District of Illinois, saw the issuance of a temporary restraining order. The TRO reflects the court's finding of immediate risk or harm requiring short-term injunctive relief. The order pauses certain actions pending further court proceedings.

Northern District of Illinois

Amble v. Rockford Fire Department, docket 22-cv-50196 in the Northern District of Illinois, features a court order granting an extension of time. The extension relates to filing deadlines, indicating active litigation and ongoing procedural management. This order affects the timing of responses or replies in the case.

Southern District of New York

Artis v. Phelps Memorial Hospital Association, docket 23-cv-09827 in the Southern District of New York, is a civil case with limited public information. The parties suggest a healthcare-related dispute, but no detailed claims or procedural updates are available. The case remains pending without substantive docket

Northern District of Illinois

Viloria v. DR Home Healthcare LLC, docket 23-cv-13813 in the Northern District of Illinois, involves a court order on a motion to file excess pages. The ruling determines whether the plaintiff may exceed standard page limits, affecting the depth of legal arguments. This procedural issue impacts case presentation.

Northern District of Illinois

In Brown v. Biolife Plasma LLC, docket 24-cv-04371 in the Northern District of Illinois, the court ruled on a motion for leave to file excess pages. The decision affects the plaintiff's ability to submit longer legal briefs, impacting the scope of argument presentation. This procedural ruling shapes how the case will

Northern District of Illinois

Eason v. United States et al, docket 25-cv-08307 in the Northern District of Illinois, remains in early stages. The case involves the United States government, but the docket lacks substantive filings or detailed claims. The procedural posture indicates initial phases without significant activity.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois closed Panasiti v. Commissioner of Social Security, docket 26-cv-10224. The case involved a dispute over social security benefits and has now been terminated by the court. The closure suggests a resolution or dismissal, but no further details are available.