Central District of California
Michael Allen Jensen v. Lazer Spot, Inc. is a civil case in the Central District of California with no substantive information available. The nature of the dispute, claims, and procedural posture remain unknown.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
46859 cases tracked · 46849 currently active
Showing 20 of 46859 matching cases
Central District of California
Michael Allen Jensen v. Lazer Spot, Inc. is a civil case in the Central District of California with no substantive information available. The nature of the dispute, claims, and procedural posture remain unknown.
Central District of California
Linda Elizabeth Ricchio filed supplemental materials in a civil suit against L. Parker and others in the Central District of California. The supplements may add evidence or arguments, indicating ongoing development in a multi-defendant case with potentially complex issues.
District of Columbia
NAMVARI v. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency is a civil case in the District of Columbia with a recent status report filed. The case lacks substantive public details about claims or procedural posture, suggesting an early or administrative phase.
District of Columbia
Jane Doe filed a civil lawsuit against the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees in the District of Columbia. A scheduling order has been issued to set case deadlines, but the underlying dispute details are not publicly available.
District of Columbia
Hiligh initiated a civil action against Duncan & Hopkins, P.C. and others in the District of Columbia. No details about the claims or procedural posture are available, leaving the dispute's nature unclear.
District of Columbia
Winfield filed a notice in a civil suit against the United States Federal Government in the District of Columbia. The notice's content is unspecified, and the case involves federal defendants, indicating potential complexity related to government actions or policies.
Northern District of Illinois
In the Northern District of Illinois, Torres v. Vestis Corporation involves a civil dispute with a recent change in counsel noted. The case is in an early phase, and no substantive details about the claims or factual background are publicly available.
District of Columbia
Issaquah School District filed suit against K.R. and others in the District of Columbia, likely involving education-related disputes. The case is active with ongoing filings, but the specific claims or legal issues remain unspecified in the docket.
Western District of Washington
McCowan v. Silva is a criminal case pending in the Western District of Washington. The docket shows early procedural filings, but the record lacks substantive details about the charges or factual background. The litigation remains in its initial stages without clear public information on the dispute.
District of Columbia
Diaz Garrido filed a lawsuit against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the District of Columbia, seeking a fee waiver by filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The case involves claims against the federal agency responsible for immigration enforcement, though specific allegations remain
District of Columbia
9878866 CANADA INC. opposes a motion in its civil suit against INTAKE BREATHING TECHNOLOGY, LLC, docket 25-cv-02443, in the District of Columbia. The opposition memorandum indicates contested procedural or substantive issues. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed.
Northern District of Illinois
The court granted an extension of time in Evans v. Uncharted Supply Company, Inc., docket 25-cv-11631, in the Northern District of Illinois. This procedural order gives parties additional time to respond or act. The case's substantive claims or issues are not disclosed.
District of Columbia
In City of New York v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Silicon Valley Bank, docket 24-cv-00160, a pro hac vice appearance was filed in the District of Columbia. This allows an out-of-state attorney to participate. The case involves the FDIC acting as receiver, but substantive claims are not
District of Columbia
Clervrain v. Holder et al, docket 19-cv-00890, received a United States Court of Appeals case number in the District of Columbia Circuit. This confirms the case is on appeal from a lower court decision. The specific issues on appeal or underlying dispute are not detailed.
Northern District of Illinois
A sealed motion was filed in United States v. Suppressed, docket 24-mc-00296, in the Northern District of Illinois. The sealing indicates sensitive or confidential information is involved. The case details and parties beyond the United States remain undisclosed.
District of Columbia
The court granted an extension of time in Pressey v. Shakespeare Theatre Company, docket 25-cv-01663. This procedural ruling allows parties additional time to meet deadlines such as filing or responding to motions. The case's substantive issues remain unspecified.
District of Columbia
The United States filed a status report order in civil case 23-cv-01232 against Maresca and others in the District of Columbia. The order reflects ongoing case management and procedural oversight. Details on claims or relief sought remain undisclosed.
District of Columbia
Smith filed an opposition memorandum to a motion in a civil dispute against Athena Construction Group, Inc., docket 18-cv-02080. The case involves contested issues likely related to contract or construction claims. The litigation remains active with substantive motions under court consideration.
District of Columbia
In civil case 25-cv-10150, Han and others challenge actions by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. The parties filed a stipulation and proposed order, suggesting a procedural or substantive agreement pending court approval. The case likely involves immigration-related claims against USCIS.
District of Columbia
The District of Columbia court ruled on Mansoori's motion for an extension of time in criminal case 21-cv-06242. The court's order addressed the request to extend a procedural deadline, affecting the case timeline. The ruling either granted or denied the extension, impacting how the parties proceed.