Browse Cases

Northern District of Illinois

Xiaocong Pan v. Zhangzhou guanying dianzi shangwu youxiangongsi is a civil case in the Northern District of Illinois. The provided information does not detail the specific filings or current status of the litigation. Further details are needed to assess the case.

District of New Jersey

WU v. GSX TECHEDU INC. et al is a civil case in the District of New Jersey. A memorandum in support of a motion has been filed. This document argues for the granting of a specific request made to the court.

Eastern District of Texas

Harmon v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al is a civil case in the Eastern District of Texas. A request for an extension of time to file a document has been granted. This indicates the case is ongoing and procedural deadlines are being managed.

Southern District of New York

Archibald et al v. Banks et al is a civil case filed in the Southern District of New York. No specific filing or action is detailed in the provided summary. The nature of the dispute remains unclear without further information.

Southern District of New York

Sherr v. Board of Elections in the City of New York is a civil case in the Southern District of New York. The specific filing or action taken is not detailed in the provided information. Further updates would be needed to understand the current status.

Northern District of Illinois

Orlando is suing Imagen of Illinois, PLLC in a civil case filed in the Northern District of Illinois. The provided summary is blank, indicating no specific filings or events are currently highlighted. The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant.

Northern District of California

Mundle et al v. Doxo Inc et al is a civil matter before the Northern District of California. A party has filed an administrative motion seeking permission to file documents under seal. This request aims to protect sensitive information from public view.

Northern District of Illinois

Smith v. DFS Services LLC et al is a civil case in the Northern District of Illinois. An order has been issued dismissing or closing the case, or a specific party within it. This action concludes the litigation for the dismissed elements.

Central District of California

Moscow v. Weld County Probation et al. is a civil case filed in the Central District of California under docket number 25-cv-03975. The current docket entry notes a 'Brief (non-motion non-appeal)', indicating a filing that is not a motion or an appeal.

Northern District of California

Kang et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al. is a civil case in the Northern District of California, docketed as 23-cv-05106. The case involves a memorandum/opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals, though the specifics of the ruling are not detailed.

Central District of California

USA v. Khatchikyan et al. is a criminal case in the Central District of California, docketed as 24-cr-00214. The current entry indicates a manual filing, specifically G-92, which is a procedural step in criminal proceedings.

Central District of California

Brown v. United States of America is a civil case filed in the Central District of California. The docket number is 22-cv-04494. The current status indicates that a payment has been received.

Northern District of Illinois

The United States versus Spriggs et al is a criminal case in the Northern District of Illinois. The proceedings are currently in the sentencing phase. This stage follows a conviction and determines the punishment for the defendant(s).

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey issued a 60-day administrative termination order in this civil case. This order suggests the case is being placed on a track for potential dismissal if no further action is taken by the parties within the specified timeframe.

District of New Jersey

A Quality Control (QC) filing related to Local Civil Rule 5.1(c) was made in this civil case in the District of New Jersey. This filing likely pertains to ensuring compliance with specific court rules regarding case management or electronic filing.

District of New Jersey

No specific filing or action is detailed for KAETZ v. THE UNITED STATES et al in the District of New Jersey. The docket entry is blank, providing no information on the current status or recent activity in this civil case.

District of New Jersey

The United States filed a notice of attorney appearance in this criminal case in the District of New Jersey. This filing formally indicates that a specific attorney or law firm will represent the government in the proceedings.

District of New Jersey

No specific filing or action is detailed for MURILLO v. FATTORI in the District of New Jersey. The docket entry is blank, providing no information on the current status or recent activity in this civil case.

District of New Jersey

No specific filing or action is detailed for BUILD et al v. TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON in the District of New Jersey. The docket entry is blank, providing no information on the current status or recent activity in this civil case.

District of New Jersey

No specific filing or action is detailed for NICHOLSON v. THE ATLANTIC GROUP INC. in the District of New Jersey. The docket entry is blank, providing no information on the current status or recent activity in this civil case.