Browse Cases

Central District of California

Proof of service was filed in Sexton v. Superhumn, Inc. in the Central District of California, confirming that legal documents were properly served on defendants. This procedural step advances the civil case by establishing that defendants received notice. The case continues with active litigation.

Central District of California

The court granted a motion to dismiss in Milan Hassid v. Alex and Ani, LLC, terminating the lawsuit. The dismissal ends the plaintiff's claims against the defendants in the Central District of California. The ruling resolves the dispute without trial or further proceedings.

Central District of California

Franz Haas GmbH/srl v. Winebow Inc. proceeds under a United States Court of Appeals (USCA) mandate in the Central District of California. The case follows appellate instructions, indicating ongoing compliance with higher court orders. The docket reflects continued litigation consistent with the mandate.

Central District of California

A request for attorney appearance or reassignment was filed in a sealed criminal case in the Central District of California. The filing indicates a change or confirmation in legal representation for a defendant in a federal criminal matter. Details remain confidential due to the sealed status.

Central District of California

iRent Inc. and State Farm submitted a stipulation and proposed order in a civil case in the Central District of California. The stipulation concerns undisclosed details but reflects cooperation between the parties on procedural or substantive issues. The filing may affect case management or resolution.

Central District of California

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical sued Navinta LLC and others in the Central District of California, alleging fraud, breach of contract, and other torts. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages for alleged misconduct by ONTRAC LOGISTICS, INC. and co-defendants, including Brian Hoolahan. The case involves complex

Central District of California

Plaintiff Ivo Tanku Tapang filed a notice of lodging in Tapang v. Nsahlai, a civil case in the Central District of California. The filing signals the plaintiff's intent to participate in the litigation and may relate to submitting evidence or documents for court consideration. The case remains active with ongoing

Central District of California

In United States v. Ciobanu, the defendants face allegations of violating bond conditions under CR-80 in the Central District of California. The accusations concern non-compliance with bond terms, which may lead to additional legal consequences or detention. The case focuses on enforcement of bond requirements.

Central District of California

The United States scheduled hearings in a civil case involving Cureton in the Central District of California. These hearings will allow both parties to present arguments and evidence, advancing the litigation process. The scheduling marks a procedural step toward resolving the dispute.

Central District of California

The Central District of California granted an extension of time in Pierce v. Kilongo, allowing the parties additional time to meet litigation deadlines. The order affects the case schedule but does not address the substantive claims or disputes between the parties. The case remains active with further developments

Central District of California

The United States Court of Appeals issued a mandate in USA v. Michaels, docket number 16-cr-00076 in the Central District of California. The mandate sets procedural requirements or deadlines following appellate review in this civil case. The case proceeds under appellate court directives.

Central District of California

A deficiency claim related to a writ of execution was noted in Welter v. Hurt, docket number 23-cv-02627 in the Central District of California. The court provided an optional HTML form to address the deficiency. This issue may affect enforcement of the writ until resolved.

Central District of California

The Central District of California granted an extension to file an answer in Nana Si v. Emmel, docket number 25-cv-09089. The extension allows the defendant more than 30 additional days beyond the original deadline to respond to the complaint. This procedural relief delays immediate case progression.

Central District of California

A motion to dismiss was filed in Thomas Lavia et al v. Standard Fire Insurance Company, docket number 26-cv-03060 in the Central District of California. The motion seeks to terminate the multi-party lawsuit involving Black Dog Coffee Roasters L.L.C. on various grounds, potentially narrowing or ending the case.

Northern District of Illinois

United States Gypsum Company filed suit against Dependable LLC in the Northern District of Illinois, docket number 22-cv-00268. The case is in early stages with no detailed claims disclosed. The filing initiates federal litigation between the parties.

Southern District of Florida

The Southern District of Florida granted a motion to quash a subpoena in Neal v. Sports Stats IQ LLC, docket number 25-cv-21947. The plaintiff successfully prevented the production of certain evidence in this class action lawsuit. This ruling limits discovery scope for defendants.

Central District of California

The Central District of California noted deficiencies in the filings for Nghia Giang Nguyen v. Mark Bowen, docket number 25-cv-03109. The court provided an optional HTML form to address the document issues. This procedural step may delay case progress until corrected.

Central District of California

HSBC Bank petitioned the Central District of California to impose probation and supervised release on the Torres defendants, docket number 25-cv-02740. The petition references prior docket entries to support sentencing conditions. The court is considering these post-conviction measures.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois entered a default judgment in favor of Spanish Prayers, LLC against The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A, docket number 25-cv-12545. The defendants failed to respond, resulting in the court ruling for the plaintiff by default.

Central District of California

The Central District of California is handling a counterclaim in Copenhagen v. DDC Enterprise Limited, docket number 25-cv-02708. The dispute involves business-related issues between the plaintiff and defendants, including DDC Enterprise Limited. The case remains active with ongoing filings.