Browse Cases

Central District of California

The Central District of California issued a protective order in HNL Fashion, Inc. v. Edgemine, Inc. et al, docket 25-cv-05796. The order likely restricts disclosure of sensitive information during litigation.

Central District of California

The Central District of California scheduled a settlement conference in Run The World Inc. v. Jiang, docket 23-cv-03130. The court aims to help negotiation between parties to resolve the dispute without further litigation.

Central District of California

The Central District of California issued an Initial Case Management Scheduling Order in Wang v. Jin, docket 26-cv-03111. The order sets deadlines for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to encourage settlement and establish a timeline for case progression.

Northern District of California

The Northern District of California updated case management procedures in Smail v. Melen, LLC, docket number 26-cv-02564. The updates involve administrative functions such as setting or clearing case flags, indicating routine case tracking activities.

District of New Jersey

Fabian Limas filed a motion to extend the time to answer in the case against Lesbia Nohemi Bautista Ayala et al. The court granted the motion, allowing Limas 30 days or less to respond. This suggests that the court is giving Limas additional time to prepare a response to the complaint.

District of Columbia

Mansoob and others sued Blinken and others. The court granted the plaintiffs an extension of time to file their case. The litigation is now in this extended procedural posture.

Northern District of California

Lee v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC (erroneously sued as CVS Pharmacy, Inc.) is a civil case with an unknown court. The case has a docket number of 26-cv-04354. The current summary of the case is a Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. This document is a standard form used to identify the parties involved in a lawsuit

Central District of California

Rukiya Gordon and others reached a stipulation and order with Amplity Health et al. in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-01614. The stipulation signals progress toward settlement or resolution of contested issues. The order formalizes the agreement and guides further case proceedings.

Northern District of California

In Jackson v. VNGR Beverage LLC, docket 24-cv-06666 in the Northern District of California, the parties have set and reset deadlines. This reflects ongoing case management and active litigation. The adjustments to deadlines may affect discovery, motions, or trial scheduling.

Northern District of California

Gerber and others filed an opposition to a motion in their lawsuit against Twitter, Inc. in the Northern District of California, docket 23-cv-00186. This filing marks a critical phase where parties contest legal arguments and seek to influence the court's rulings. The opposition suggests active defense and strategic

Northern District of Illinois

Hooks sued CloudSpotter Technologies Inc. and others in the Northern District of Illinois, docket 25-cv-09754. The civil lawsuit is advancing toward the pre-trial stage, indicating that discovery and motions practice are likely underway. The plaintiffs seek to hold multiple defendants accountable, though specific

Central District of California

The Central District of California granted a Temporary Restraining Order in the dispute between 7980 Sunset Associates and Nunzio Donato Ciaraulo et al., docket 26-cv-01150. The order aims to prevent further harm or damage while the case proceeds. This emergency relief reflects the court's recognition of potential

Central District of California

Irene Gudis and others sued Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC for negligence and product liability in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-01932. The plaintiffs allege vehicle defects that caused injuries, seeking damages. The case centers on automotive safety and manufacturer responsibility for defective products.

Central District of California

Robinson filed an affidavit of service in a multidistrict litigation proceeding in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-02814. The affidavit confirms proper service of complaints on defendants, a procedural step necessary to advance the case. The filing supports the progression of the multidistrict

Central District of California

Myers and others filed a civil action against Gilead Sciences, Inc. and additional defendants in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-02668. The case includes at least one court order, indicating judicial involvement in case management or dispute resolution. Specific allegations or claims have not been

Central District of California

Plaintiffs filed procedural motions against Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC in a civil suit before the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-01576. The motions address scheduling and hearing settings, reflecting active litigation management. The underlying claims remain unspecified but likely involve

Central District of California

Advanced Integrated Circuit Process LLC sued United Microelectronics Corporation for patent infringement in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-00730. The plaintiff alleges unauthorized use of patented semiconductor manufacturing technologies, focusing on intellectual property rights and proprietary

Central District of California

The U.S. government moved to expedite motions in the military justice case against Guachiac. The request aims to speed up judicial processes in this military legal matter.

District of Columbia

Aviles filed a motion requesting a court order in the civil suit against Compass Group North America. The motion seeks judicial intervention to advance or clarify issues in the litigation.

Central District of California

The government filed a motion to expedite motions in the criminal case against Youn Kim and others. The request aims to accelerate pretrial proceedings in this federal criminal matter.