Browse Cases

District of New Jersey

RMJ Small Biz LLC sued Occams Advisory Inc. in the District of New Jersey. The case is in early stages, with recent filings including a motion in support. The nature of the dispute is not publicly detailed.

District of New Jersey

Callender-Hammond and others filed a civil suit against Tuncay in the District of New Jersey. The case is linked to other related litigation, suggesting complex procedural coordination or consolidation efforts. Details of the underlying dispute remain limited.

Central District of California

Ritenburgh sued Clark County Jail and related defendants in the Central District of California, alleging issues likely related to detainee treatment or conditions of confinement. The case is active with ongoing procedural motions and responses.

Eastern District of Texas

Ring filed a reply opposing a motion by Argyle Volunteer Fire Department in the Eastern District of Texas, docket 21-cv-00917. The reply addresses the defendant's arguments and supports Ring's position.

District of New Jersey

In Lewandowski v. TAL Education Group, docket 23-cv-01769 in the District of New Jersey, defendants filed motions to dismiss certain claims. The case continues with ongoing motions and discovery activity.

District of New Jersey

Baxter Healthcare Corp. filed an application for a refund of fees in civil litigation before the District of New Jersey, docket 25-cv-15120. The application seeks to recover fees paid during the course of the lawsuit.

District of New Jersey

Jinhua Hibo Technology Co., Ltd. filed an opposition brief in its patent-related suit against Usmartplus Inc. in the District of New Jersey, docket 24-cv-08257. The brief counters a motion filed by the opposing party.

District of Massachusetts

In USA v. Niedzwiecki, docket 24-cr-10366 in the District of Massachusetts, the defendant moves to end probation early. This criminal case continues with the defendant seeking relief from probation conditions.

Northern District of California

Google LLC and Headwater Research LLC filed a stipulation and proposed order in their dispute before the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-09558. The filing signals progress toward a resolution between the parties.

District of Massachusetts

In Curtin v. Cambridge Health Alliance, docket 24-cv-10840, plaintiffs request reconsideration of a prior ruling in the District of Massachusetts. They emphasize the need for a fresh evaluation of evidence and arguments.

District of Massachusetts

Plaintiffs in Bisasor v. Fedex Office, docket 26-cv-10842 in the District of Massachusetts, seek an extension to file claims. The motion cites concerns about delays and potential prejudice if the extension is denied.

District of Massachusetts

The District of Massachusetts court assigned new counsel in the criminal case Timmins v. Henderson, docket 22-cv-00754. The reassignment follows a Notice of Case Assignment, signaling a change in legal representation for one party.

Northern District of California

Farooq appeals a civil case against Standard Chartered Bank in the Northern District of California under docket 24-cv-00336. The appeal proceeds In Forma Pauperis, allowing Farooq to avoid court fees due to financial hardship. The underlying dispute details remain unspecified.

Northern District of California

A status report was filed in Hyams v. CVS Health Corporation, docket 18-cv-06278 in the Northern District of California. The report updates the court on the current state of the ongoing civil litigation. No new rulings or motions were indicated.

District of Massachusetts

Plaintiff filed a second Rule 26 disclosure in Iskendarian v. Hingham Institute, docket 25-cv-13615 in the District of Massachusetts. The disclosure expands the evidentiary record, providing additional information for discovery. The case remains in the discovery phase.

District of Massachusetts

A notice of rescheduling was filed in Catanese v. Brandt, docket 23-cv-11372 in the District of Massachusetts. The filing adjusts the litigation schedule, reflecting ongoing case management. No substantive rulings or motions were reported.

Northern District of California

Respondents filed a reply addressing opposition arguments in Doe v. Deutsche Lufthansa, docket 23-cv-04413 in the Northern District of California. The reply responds to the court's concerns in this multi-party federal litigation. The case remains active with ongoing briefing.

District of Massachusetts

A notice of case assignment was filed in the criminal case USA v. Fraga, docket 17-cr-10320, in the District of Massachusetts. This administrative filing assigns the case to a judge or magistrate. No substantive developments or rulings were noted.

District of Massachusetts

In AGATAKO v. Morgan & Morgan Boston PLLC, docket 26-cv-11812 in the District of Massachusetts, a procedural notice was filed. The filing signals procedural updates or administrative adjustments in the civil case. No substantive motions or rulings were reported.

District of Massachusetts

A procedural notice was filed in White et al v. WIN Waste Innovations of Northern New England Inc., case 25-cv-12229 in the District of Massachusetts. The notice likely addresses administrative or scheduling matters. No substantive rulings or motions were indicated.