Browse Cases

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Spiegel et al v. Al-Hussein Al-Hashemi et al, docket number 25-cv-09703, the plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel. The specific details of the dispute and the nature of the motion are not provided, but a motion to compel typically involves a request for the court to order the opposing party to

Northern District of Illinois

The case 1:23-cv-04875 United States of America, et al. v. KSO Metalfab Inc., et al. involves the United States government and potentially other plaintiffs bringing legal action against KSO Metalfab Inc. and additional defendants. The docket indicates a procedural motion related to leave to file a document, suggesting

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Crawford et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al, docket number 20-cv-05132, the parties requested an extension of time, as reflected in docket entry 126. The case involves plaintiffs Crawford and others against McDonald's USA, LLC and additional defendants. Specific details about the underlying claims

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 1:25-cv-15387 Okeley et al v. Alstom Transportation USA Inc., the plaintiffs filed a motion seeking leave to file certain documents or claims, which prompted the court to issue an order addressing this procedural request. The details of the motion and the court's ruling on it are part of the ongoing

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Littrice et al v. Together Chicago, docket number 25-cv-12769, the court addressed a motion for leave to file additional documents or pleadings. The order pertains to whether the plaintiffs or defendants were permitted to submit further filings beyond the original complaint or response. While specific

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Lasisi v. Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLC, docket number 24-cv-06220, the court issued an order regarding a motion for an extension of time. The specifics of the motion and the court's ruling are not detailed in the available information. The case involves procedural matters related to scheduling or

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Pawnee Leasing Corporation v. Mr. Munchies Food LLC et al, the court addressed a Motion in Limine, which is a pretrial request to exclude certain evidence from being presented during the trial. The order on this motion reflects the court's decisions regarding the admissibility of specific evidence that

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Brumfield v. Naperville Officers John Doe 1 & 2 et al, docket number 25-cv-15756, the court addressed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which allows a plaintiff to file a lawsuit without paying standard court fees due to financial hardship. The order pertains to whether the plaintiff

Northern District of Illinois

In the case Bennett v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, docket number 25-cv-21039, the plaintiff Bennett has initiated legal proceedings against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. The case involves a dispute likely centered around insurance claims or benefits, as suggested by the defendant's

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled USA v. Mobley, docket number 23-cr-20288, involves a criminal proceeding against the defendant Mobley. The available document is a Notice of Reassignment of Federal Public Defender (FPD), indicating a change in legal representation for the defendant. Specific details about the charges or factual

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled USA v. Richardson, docket number 26-cr-00124, involves criminal proceedings against the defendant Richardson. While specific facts of the case are not provided, the available information indicates procedural activity related to setting or resetting deadlines and hearings. This suggests ongoing

Southern District of Florida

The court issued a report and recommendations in Betternoi, LLC v. Aloizos et al, a civil dispute pending in the Southern District of Florida under docket 25-cv-60090. The report likely addresses dispositive or procedural matters, with further court action expected.

Southern District of Florida

The court set a deadline for MSC Cruises to respond in Dunne v. MSC Cruises, a civil case in the Southern District of Florida under docket 26-cv-20838. The case is in early procedural stages and may involve personal injury, contract, or consumer claims related to cruise services.

Southern District of Florida

In Admiral v. The Episcopal Church of Saint Mark the Evangelist, Inc., the court noted a pro hac vice appearance by out-of-state counsel. The case is pending in the Southern District of Florida under docket 25-cv-61957. No substantive details about claims or issues are publicly available.

District of Massachusetts

A telephone conference occurred in Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority v. Gomes, addressing case management or procedural issues. The civil dispute involves a regional transportation authority and an individual or entity, under docket 24-cv-13040 in the District of Massachusetts.

District of Massachusetts

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts filed a notice in a civil case against Donald Trump and others, signaling active litigation involving high-profile defendants. The case, docket 25-cv-12162 in the District of Massachusetts, likely involves governmental claims on regulatory or administrative grounds.

District of Massachusetts

In Galli v. Cognism Inc., the parties filed a stipulation agreeing on certain matters to help the civil litigation. The case involves a plaintiff and a corporate defendant, possibly concerning contract or employment issues, under docket 25-cv-13153 in the District of Massachusetts.

District of Massachusetts

Counsel for both parties filed a joint statement in TB Holdings, LLC v. Town of Saugus, reflecting cooperation on procedural or substantive issues. The civil dispute likely involves property, zoning, or contractual matters under docket 25-cv-12330 in the District of Massachusetts.

District of Massachusetts

The court issued an order on a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in Poole v. Peters, allowing the plaintiff to litigate without court fees if financial hardship is proven. This procedural ruling impacts the plaintiff's ability to continue the civil case under docket 25-cv-40188 in the District of Massachusetts.

District of Massachusetts

In Lenehan v. Town of Lenox, the plaintiff filed a memorandum supporting a motion in this civil dispute. The case involves a local government defendant and likely concerns administrative or governance issues in the District of Massachusetts under docket 26-cv-30011.