Browse Cases

Northern District of California

Scientific Certification Systems, Inc. filed a civil lawsuit against Stearns, Conrad And Schmidt, Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the Northern District of California. The dispute likely involves professional or contractual issues related to engineering services, though details remain unspecified.

Eastern District of Texas

Strong was granted in forma pauperis status on appeal against Matthews in the Eastern District of Texas. This allows Strong to proceed without prepaying fees due to financial hardship, keeping the appellate review active under docket 19-cv-00003.

District of Massachusetts

Plaintiff O'Donnell voluntarily dismissed the civil case against Wheelings Bar, LLC in the District of Massachusetts. The dismissal occurred before trial or final judgment, ending the litigation without a court decision on the merits.

District of New Jersey

S.L. filed a civil lawsuit against Pressler, Felt & Warshaw LLP and others in the District of New Jersey. The case is in its initial phase with no docket activity or substantive filings available to clarify the nature of the claims or defenses.

District of Massachusetts

The District of Massachusetts assigned a judge to Evans v. United States of America et al, advancing the case into active judicial management. The docket does not reveal details about the claims or parties' positions, but the involvement of the United States suggests federal issues or government liability may be at

Southern District of New York

Rockefeller Photos, LLC filed a lawsuit against Antillana, Metro Supermarket, Corp., and additional defendants. While the precise nature of the underlying dispute is not disclosed, the case is currently in the pretrial phase, with recent docket activity involving requests for extensions of time to file documents. This

Central District of California

Gerardo Cabanillas filed a lawsuit against the City of South Gate and additional defendants under docket number 24-cv-08027. The case record indicates a substitution of attorney, reflecting a change in legal representation for one of the parties involved. However, the available information does not disclose the nature

Southern District of New York

The case 1:24-cv-06102 Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC involves a civil dispute between the two parties. Recent docket activity shows that the court is managing procedural aspects of the litigation, including a request for an extension of time related to filing deadlines or responses. While the specific claims

Southern District of New York

The case 1:22-cv-08137 Charbern Management Group LLC v. Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Nahins & Goidel, P.C. is a civil dispute involving Charbern Management Group LLC and the law firm Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Nahins & Goidel, P.C. Specific claims or causes of action have not been disclosed, but the case is active

Southern District of New York

The case 1:24-cv-04683 Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP v. StateHouse Holdings, Inc. is a legal dispute between a law firm and a corporate entity. Although specific claims have not been disclosed, the involvement of a law firm as plaintiff and a corporation as defendant suggests issues related to contractual or

Central District of California

The case 8:20-cv-01383 Ahmed Al Bakry v. Al H. Zadeh et al involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Ahmed Al Bakry, and multiple defendants including Al H. Zadeh. The case is currently in active litigation, with procedural motions and replies being filed, indicating ongoing legal arguments and case management

Southern District of New York

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company initiated a lawsuit against Day to Day Imports Inc. and additional defendants under docket number 22-cv-02181. The dispute centers around issues related to insurance coverage or claims, given Liberty Mutual's role as the plaintiff. While specific allegations and the relief sought have

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:23-cv-06895 Fanatics Collectibles Topco, Inc. v. Panini S.P.A., Fanatics Collectibles Topco, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against Panini S.P.A. concerning disputes related to the collectible trading card industry. Although specific claims are not detailed, the issues likely involve intellectual property

Southern District of New York

The case 1:23-cv-01170 Basri v. Gordon et al is a civil dispute currently in the pre-trial phase before an unspecified court. The parties have submitted a Proposed Pre-Trial Order, which is a procedural document outlining the issues to be addressed at trial, agreements on evidentiary matters, and the scheduling of

Southern District of New York

In the case Albert v. DistroKid LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-01705, the plaintiff Albert filed a lawsuit against DistroKid LLC and other defendants. The matter before the court involved a procedural request for an extension of time for the defendants to file their answer to the complaint. This request is a routine

Central District of California

In the case of Demetrius T. Freeman v. J. Zilliox et al, the plaintiff initiated legal action against the defendants, resulting in a motion for summary judgment. The court's role was to determine whether any genuine disputes of material fact existed that would necessitate a trial or if the defendants were entitled to

Central District of California

The case Jeff Lambing v. Snap Lock Industries Inc. et al, docket number 25-cv-09575, involves litigation between the plaintiff Jeff Lambing and the defendant Snap Lock Industries Inc. along with additional parties. The current procedural posture includes a motion for leave to file a document, indicating active ongoing

Central District of California

In the case 8:24-cv-02778 Hasibullah Nawabi v. Carolyn Colvin, the plaintiff Hasibullah Nawabi initiated legal proceedings against Carolyn Colvin. The docket entry referenced pertains to an appearance filed in the case, indicating procedural steps in the litigation process. Specific details about the nature of the

Southern District of New York

In the case 2:25-cv-00697 XR Communications LLC d/b/a Vivato Technologies v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., XR Communications, operating as Vivato Technologies, has initiated litigation against T-Mobile USA, Inc. The case involves a formal dispute between the two parties, with recent procedural developments including the filing

Western District of Washington

The case titled Daniels v. Crotty et al, docket number 1:25-cv-20137, involves an appeal that has been forwarded to the United States Court of Appeals (USCA). While specific details of the underlying dispute are not provided, the procedural posture indicates that the case is currently under appellate review following