Browse Cases

District of Columbia

This case involves plaintiffs B.D. et al. against the District of Columbia. The docket indicates procedural activity related to appearances pro hac vice, suggesting involvement of out-of-state counsel. Specific substantive issues or claims are not detailed in the available summary.

Northern District of California

This case involves Alice Rosenblum as the plaintiff against Passes, Inc. and other defendants. The docket indicates procedural activity related to transcript orders, suggesting ongoing litigation but lacking substantive details on the claims or defenses involved. The nature of the dispute and the court's jurisdiction

Southern District of Florida

Lewter v. Northfield Holdings Corp Florida was dismissed and closed by court order. The court ended the case, possibly due to settlement, procedural issues, or merits ruling. No further details on the grounds or claims are available.

Southern District of Florida

Fly All Ways N.V. v. Northern Air Cargo LLC was dismissed for failure to state a claim. The court found the plaintiff's complaint insufficient to proceed, effectively ending the case unless amended. This dismissal is a substantive ruling on the pleadings.

Southern District of Florida

Prince v. City of Coral Springs Florida initiated litigation with summons issued and electronic case filing completed. The case is at its inception, targeting the city and other defendants. No substantive claims or defenses have been disclosed.

Southern District of Florida

Howarth v. Ross Brothers LLC shows procedural filings such as certificates of service, indicating compliance with court notification rules. The case appears to be in early or mid-litigation stages with no substantive developments reported.

Southern District of Florida

Spencer v. Revance Therapeutics Inc. was dismissed and closed by court order. The litigation concluded without disclosed reasons for dismissal. The case record does not provide information on the nature of the dispute or grounds for termination.

Southern District of Florida

Pou v. Beis LLC was dismissed and closed by court order in the Southern District of Florida. The dismissal terminates the case, though the record does not specify whether it was with or without prejudice or the reasons. No substantive facts or claims were provided.

Southern District of Florida

Oropesa v. XpresSpa Holdings LLC was voluntarily dismissed by stipulation of the parties. The dismissal indicates resolution without trial or further litigation. No details about the underlying claims or settlement were disclosed.

Southern District of Florida

Eddy v. South University of Florida-Member LLC is progressing with adjustments to procedural deadlines. The court has set or reset response deadlines, indicating active case management. No substantive claims or defenses have been detailed publicly.

Southern District of Florida

Proveyer v. Salumeria 104 Delray LLC settled the dispute, ending litigation in the Southern District of Florida. The settlement terms remain confidential, and no further court action is expected. The case is closed following the notice of settlement filed by counsel.

Southern District of Florida

The Southern District of Florida reassigned Perez v. Kaplan North America LLC to a new judge or venue. This procedural change affects case management and scheduling but does not alter the substantive issues of the dispute. The case remains active under the new assignment.

Northern District of California

This case is identical in title and docket to case 5511, involving Volvo Penta of the Americas, LLC and Boater's Insurance Agency, Inc. The current docket entry also concerns an order on a motion for pro hac vice admission. No further substantive information is provided.

Northern District of California

This civil case, identical in parties and docket to case 5506, also reports certification of an ADR session. The duplication indicates concurrent or related proceedings involving Little Seeds Children's Center, Inc. and Citibank, N.A., focusing on dispute resolution efforts. The emphasis on ADR certification

Northern District of California

This entry duplicates the case of Apple Inc. versus 1000 Van Ness LP, with a focus on the certificate or proof of service. The procedural confirmation of service indicates that the defendant has been formally notified of the claims, enabling the litigation to proceed.

Northern District of California

This case duplicates the matter involving Doe et al versus Blue Cross California et al, with a focus on ADR certification. The parties have engaged in discussions about alternative dispute resolution options, which may facilitate a negotiated settlement or other forms of dispute resolution outside of trial.

Northern District of California

Armstrong filed a civil suit against Paramount Global and others, with recent docket activity showing a stipulation and proposed order submitted. This suggests parties may be negotiating or agreeing on certain procedural or substantive matters to streamline the litigation process.

Northern District of California

This is a related or duplicate entry to the Hart v. County of Mendocino case, also showing a procedural remark. No additional substantive information is provided to clarify the issues or progress of the case.

Northern District of California

This matter also concerns a motion for a protective order regarding a subpoena directed at Anthropic, PBC. The court's order will determine the scope of discovery and the protection of potentially sensitive or proprietary information.

District of Columbia

Stone v. United States Department of State CA/OCS/CI et al involves an order granting leave to file a review. This procedural order allows a party to submit additional filings for the court's consideration, indicating ongoing administrative or judicial review processes. The docket 21-cv-03244 identifies this as a