Browse Cases

Central District of California

The United States charged Miranda in a magistrate-level criminal matter, docket 25-mj-05414. The current filing is a motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582, tied to the United States Sentencing Commission's 2023 Amendment 821, which retroactively adjusted how criminal history points are calculated for certain

Central District of California

In this case, Jefferies Funding LLC files a notice of appearance, substitution, change, and withdrawal of attorney. The transcript indicates that the procedural matters are being addressed to ensure proper representation and compliance with court rules.

Central District of California

Ye v. Even Hotel 35 LLC et al involves a proposed case management plan, suggesting the parties are organizing the timeline and procedures for litigation. The case likely concerns a civil dispute requiring coordinated discovery and motion practice. No substantive rulings or factual summaries are currently available.

Central District of California

In the case of Kristopher Rene Gomez v. Baller Busters et al, the plaintiff has filed a lawsuit against the defendants identified as Baller Busters. The case is currently marked by procedural challenges, particularly concerning the service of process. The court records indicate that service by publication has been

District of Colorado

The case of Katsel et al v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited et al, docket number 25-cv-00699, currently has no summary provided.

Southern District of New York

Declaration in Support of Motion was filed in the case of Lloyd v. Argent Trust Company et al, docket number 22-cv-04129. The summary is currently incomplete.

Southern District of New York

Gray Local Media, Inc. initiated a motion in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) with docket number 26-mc-00157. The case summary is currently incomplete.

Southern District of New York

Chanel, Inc. filed a lawsuit against The RealReal, Inc., seeking legal recourse under docket number 18-cv-10626. The case summary is currently incomplete.

Southern District of New York

The case involves a Local Rule 37.2 Conference related to a multi-district litigation (MDL) with docket number 25-cv-08071. The conference is noted as the 85th in the series.

Southern District of New York

Khodakhah responds to the amended complaint filed by Montefiore Health System and co-defendants. The docket number is 1:24-cv-00839.

Central District of California

In this civil lawsuit filed in the Southern District of New York, Linda Cooper files a notice of appearance or withdrawal of counsel. The docket number is 2:24-cv-08187.

Central District of California

Brian Crist filed a non-opposition to a motion in a civil case, showing compliance with court procedures.

Central District of California

Roberto Arturo Monterrosa Jr. filed a notice to proceed in forma pauperis with a declaration in support, indicating a low-income status and a formal legal submission.

Central District of California

Alexander Reilly filed an answer to the complaint in a civil case, demonstrating the opening of the attorney-client relationship in this matter.

Central District of California

This sealed document case involves a sealed document filed in the United States District Court. The sealing of the document suggests that the contents are confidential and not intended to be publicly disclosed.

Central District of California

This is a return of service by the USMO in a federal criminal case in the Eastern District of California. The document confirms that service was properly executed, but the specifics of the case are not detailed in the summary.

District of Colorado

In Alfredo Murciano, M.D., P.A. v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. et al, a protective order has been issued. This order likely aims to protect sensitive information or prevent harassment, highlighting the sensitive nature of the litigation between the parties.

Central District of California

In the case of Blue et al v. Municipal Parking Services, Inc. et al, the court issued a notice related to procedural or administrative matters. The details of the notice are not specified, but it likely pertains to case management or scheduling.

Southern District of New York

In the case of Tamara Bodnar v. SecureSpace Management LLC et al, docket number 26-cv-03186, the plaintiff chose to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit. This dismissal was made under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), which permits a plaintiff to end the case without a court order, provided the defendant has not

District of Colorado

Peterson v. Chase et al. The attorney representing Peterson withdrew from the case, leaving the plaintiff without legal representation.