Browse Cases

District of New Jersey

A status conference was held in the same multi-district litigation, with the parties confirming the scheduled proceedings. No new factual developments or legal arguments were presented during the conference.

Central District of California

Substitute Attorney G-01 has been appointed in a civil lawsuit involving William Blatter and Chiquita Canyon, LLC. The case number is 25-cv-12056, and the current status indicates a substitute attorney has been assigned.

District of New Jersey

The National Labor Relations Board and several other parties are seeking to set hearings in a civil matter involving 710 Long Ridge Road Operating Company II, LLC. The case is currently pending and awaiting further procedural steps.

District of New Jersey

Another Joint Discovery Plan has been filed in the same DIAZ v. Ryder Claims Service Corp. et al case, reinforcing the collaborative approach to evidence sharing.

Central District of California

Notice (Other) has been filed in the N.Y. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity et al case, indicating administrative or procedural communication.

District of New Jersey

The Reading v. North Hanover Township, New Jersey case has been stayed, indicating a temporary halt to proceedings pending further developments.

District of New Jersey

The plaintiff, Capriglione, seeks certification of a class action against Premier Entertainment AC, LLC. The case involves allegations of deceptive business practices.

Central District of California

This case is a motion for scheduling in a multi-district litigation (MDL) concerning Kendrick Sampson and others against the City of Los Angeles and various defendants. The motion aims to set a schedule for upcoming hearings and proceedings.

District of New Jersey

This case involves a motion to dismiss filed by Burlington Drug Co., Inc. and others against Pfizer Inc. and others, with the status indicating that motions are no longer being referred.

District of New Jersey

Manosca has filed a corporate disclosure statement as part of the litigation proceedings against DataBank Holdings, Ltd. The disclosure statement is a formal document that provides detailed information about the corporation's financial status, legal issues, and other relevant facts, which is often required in complex

Central District of California

Amorim Cork America filed a lawsuit against 1693 Distillery, LLC and other defendants, initiating case number 3:25-cv-07126. The case involves a dispute likely related to business or commercial matters, as suggested by the parties involved. The docket currently reflects an order, indicating that the court has issued a

Eastern District of Texas

Order to Show Cause issued for Service of Process in the 4:25-cv-01433 Sterkes v. USA case, requesting a hearing on the service of process.

District of New Jersey

Dandrea Produce LLC v. Wakefern Food Corp. is a commercial dispute concerning contractual obligations between the parties.

District of New Jersey

Young v. Icreditworks Inc. et al is a multi-defendant civil action seeking to hold Icreditworks Inc. and others accountable.

District of New Jersey

This is a brief motion in opposition filed in a civil case involving Foley and Cigna Group, et al., with no additional details provided.

District of New Jersey

The case involves a notice filing in a civil case between UMG Recordings, Inc. and RCN Telecom Services, LLC, with no further details provided.

District of New Jersey

The case concerns a multi-district litigation (MDL) between Alite and Campanella, et al., with no further details available.

District of New Jersey

This is a brief order in a civil case involving Powell and Walmart Stores East, LP, with no additional details provided.

District of New Jersey

The case involves a multi-district litigation (MDL) between AbbVie Inc. and Qilu Pharma, Inc. regarding alleged patent infringement and other claims.

District of New Jersey

This case involves a Text Order , which is a brief written decision issued by the court. The order provides a concise summary of the court's decision without delving into detailed legal arguments or findings of fact.