Court dismisses Turizo v. I.C. System, Inc. for lack of jurisdiction in Southern District of Florida
Southern District of Florida
Civil case in S.D. Fla. currently marked active.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
42969 cases tracked · 42969 currently active
Showing 20 of 33229 matching cases
Southern District of Florida
Civil case in S.D. Fla. currently marked active.
District of New Jersey
Civil case in D.N.J. currently marked active.
Eastern District of Texas
Civil case in E.D. Tex. currently marked active.
Northern District of California
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.
Northern District of California
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.
Northern District of California
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.
Central District of California
Turner v. Westchester Harvesting Company LLC is a civil case with a current summary of Order to Show Cause. The case was filed in the unknown court with docket number 24-cv-08056. The current status of the case is Order to Show Cause.
Southern District of Florida
The Order Dismissing/Closing Case or Party indicates that the court has dismissed or closed the case or one of the parties. This is a common practice in federal court cases, where the court may dismiss a case or a party if it is deemed to be without merit or if the parties have reached a settlement.
Southern District of Florida
USA v. Isabel et al is a criminal case with a current docket number of 15-cr-60094. The case involves an order on motion for early termination of supervised release, which is a significant development in the case. The order suggests that the defendant may be eligible for early termination of their supervised release
Central District of California
The case of Newton Brown, LLC v. Duramax Holdings, LLC et al is a civil matter currently pending in an unknown court. The docket number for this case is 25-cv-01075. The current summary of the case is an alteration of judgment. The alteration indicates that the judgment has been modified, but the specific details of
Central District of California
Henry v. TForce Freight, Inc. is a case filed in an unknown court with docket number 26-cv-00656. The case involves a report of a Rule 26(f) planning meeting, with 19 pages. The court has not provided further information about the case.
District of Columbia
Donald Pierre, Jr. and co-plaintiffs sued USAA General Indemnity Company, Inc., docket 26-cv-00598. The parties filed a joint Rule 26(f) discovery plan at filing number 15, placing the case in the early discovery phase. The suit against a major insurer suggests an insurance coverage or bad faith dispute, though the
Central District of California
In Branzuela et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, docket number 26-cv-00713 in the Central District of California, the court clerk issued a formal notice concerning procedural matters. The notice is part of routine case management and does not reveal substantive claims or developments.
Western District of Washington
Brooke Ashe Investments LLC and others filed suit against Santarelli and others in the Western District of Washington, docket number 26-cv-00702. The case was transferred, likely for consolidation or jurisdictional reasons related to a connected matter (CV-34). This procedural move aims to streamline related
District of Columbia
Jackson v. Garcia et al, docket number 26-cv-01521 in the District of Columbia, is ongoing with a recent minute order filed. The available information does not specify the claims or legal issues involved, limiting insight into the case's substance or status beyond procedural activity.
Central District of California
Global Connect Technology, Inc. amended its complaint against Canon Inc. in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cv-01209. The amendment indicates an active litigation process with adjustments to claims or legal theories, though specific issues remain unspecified in available documents.
Central District of California
Comcast Business Communications, LLC sued DISH Wireless L.L.C. and others in the Central District of California, docket number 26-cv-00824. The dispute involves multiple telecommunications companies and likely concerns complex business or contractual issues. The case suggests competitive and commercial conflicts
District of Columbia
Jason Beach v. Zazwetha et al, docket number 25-cv-00934 in the District of Columbia, reflects a procedural update involving a change of address. The case appears to be in an early or administrative phase with no substantive information about the dispute or claims available.
Central District of California
The Central District of California entered a final judgment in Sushant Gupta v. Christopher M. Brainard et al, docket number 25-cv-02174, concluding the litigation. The judgment resolves the dispute, though the claims and legal reasoning remain undisclosed. This marks the end of active court proceedings between the
District of Colorado
Dean Martin filed a civil case against Chase Bank, U.S.A., N.A. and others in the District of Colorado, docket number 26-cv-00909. The court issued a scheduling notice outlining procedural deadlines, but no substantive details about the claims or defenses are available. The case remains in pretrial stages.