Browse Cases

Central District of California

Nak Kim Chhoeun et al v. David Marin et al involves a motion hearing. The parties are awaiting a decision from the court. The court has not yet issued a ruling on the motion, and the parties are waiting for further instructions.

Central District of California

Goodwin v. Gomez et al is a civil case with an unknown court and a docket number of 24-cv-06645. The case has not been updated with any new information. The case involves multiple parties, including Goodwin and others, but the specifics of the case are not clear.

Central District of California

Alexander Alvarez v. Fidencio N. Guzman is a civil case with an unknown court and docket number 25-cv-10468. The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Alexander Alvarez, and the defendant, Fidencio N. Guzman. The case has 17 entries related to Objection/Opposition.

District of New Jersey

SMARTNET, INC. v. RAMNARINE et al is a case filed in an unknown court with docket number 25-cv-17031. Unfortunately, the current summary of the case is not available, and further information is needed to provide a detailed summary of the case. The case involves a dispute between the parties, but the details of the

Northern District of California

The case of B.L.S. v. Walnut Creek School District, with docket number 25-cv-05378, involves a Judgment on the Pleadings. The details of the judgment and the reasons behind it are not specified in the current summary. The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The plaintiff, B.L.S., is seeking relief from the

Northern District of California

The case of Rogers et al v. Airgas USA, LLC, with docket number 24-cv-02360, involves a Counterclaim. The details of the counterclaim and the reasons behind it are not specified in the current summary. The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The plaintiffs, Rogers et al, are seeking relief from Airgas USA

Northern District of Illinois

J.S. et al v. Health Care Service Corporation is a civil case. The court has terminated the civil case. The case was docketed as 22-cv-05063. The court's order was 121 pages long. The case involves multiple plaintiffs and the court's order is a significant document.

Northern District of Illinois

USA v. Villatoro-Pinzon is a criminal case with a docket number of 25-cr-00743. The court has terminated deadlines and hearings, and the court's order was 26 pages long. The case involves a single defendant and the court's order is a relatively short document.

Northern District of Illinois

Street v. National Postal Handlers Union, Local 306 is a civil case with a docket number of 25-cv-03979. The court has granted miscellaneous relief, and the court's order was 43 pages long. The case involves a labor dispute and the court's order is a significant document.

Northern District of Illinois

USA v. Barraza et al is a criminal case with a docket number of 13-cr-00021. The court has granted miscellaneous relief, and the court's order was 311 pages long. The case involves multiple defendants and the court's order is a significant document.

Northern District of Illinois

Johnson v. Hoehn et al is a civil case with a docket number of 24-cv-11991. The court has issued leave to file a document, but the details of the document and the court's decision are not specified in the current summary. The case is currently ongoing, with no further information available on the current status or

Northern District of Illinois

Westfield Insurance Company, an Ohio Corp. v. Ricketts et al is a civil case with a docket number of 24-cv-00480. The court has issued miscellaneous relief. The details of the relief and the court's decision are not specified in the current summary. The case is currently ongoing, with no further information available

Northern District of Illinois

Bennett v. Illinois State Trooper et al is a civil case. The court granted an extension of time for the plaintiff to file a response or reply, which is 54 days long. This case is currently ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

Southern District of Florida

E.R. Truck & Equipment Corporation v. 'THE AVIATRIX' et al is a civil case. The defendant filed an opposition to a motion in the case. The opposition is 25 pages long. This case is currently ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

Southern District of Florida

Kloster v. Lilium N.V. et al is a civil case with a notice regarding an other matter. The notice is 80 pages long. The specifics of the notice are not publicly available. This case is currently ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

Southern District of Florida

USA v. Flores-Arita is a criminal case that was vacated due to a 2255 motion. A new case must be filed with a new CV. The specifics of the 2255 motion are not publicly available. This case is currently closed, and no further information is available at this time.

Northern District of California

Plata et al v. Newsom et al is a civil case with a stipulation and proposed order filed on an unknown court's docket number 01-cv-01351. The stipulation and proposed order were 3768 pages long. The case details are currently unknown.

Northern District of Illinois

Makozy et al v. Trans Union LLC is a civil case with a docket number of 25-cv-14430. The plaintiffs have filed a Reply in Support of Motion, which is related to a previous filing and is part of the ongoing case. The motion is likely related to a dispute over the handling of the plaintiffs' credit information. The

Southern District of Florida

Kinsale Insurance Company v. Lobrer, LLC et al is a civil case with a substitution of counsel filed. The specifics of the substitution of counsel are not publicly available. The case has a docket number of 25-cv-61981. This case is currently ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

Southern District of Florida

v. Caldwell III et al is a civil case with a notice of removal filed. The specifics of the notice of removal are not publicly available. The case has a docket number of 26-cv-80461. The case is currently unknown in terms of court and the specifics of the notice of removal are not publicly available.