Western District of Washington
USA vs Appell is a criminal case in the Western District of Washington. No specific filings or actions are detailed in the current summary. The case is proceeding under docket number 25-cr-05337.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
42245 cases tracked · 42245 currently active
Showing 20 of 33204 matching cases
Western District of Washington
USA vs Appell is a criminal case in the Western District of Washington. No specific filings or actions are detailed in the current summary. The case is proceeding under docket number 25-cr-05337.
District of Colorado
Lamothe filed a case against Decentral Life, Inc et al. The current summary does not provide details regarding the claims or the case's present status. This filing initiates the legal process between the involved parties. The case is active in the District of Colorado. Additional filings will be necessary to
Southern District of New York
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Bursor et al is a civil case filed in the Southern District of New York. The docket number is 25-cv-10000. No specific filings or actions are detailed in the current summary.
Southern District of New York
Wilson v. Selip & Stylianou, LLP et al is a civil case filed in the Southern District of New York. No specific filings or actions are detailed in the current summary. The case is proceeding under docket number 24-cv-04108.
Southern District of New York
Brunckhorst III et al filed a case against Bischoff et al. The current summary does not specify the nature of the claims or the current status of the litigation. This filing marks the commencement of legal action. The case is active in the Southern District of New York. Further filings will be required to understand
District of New Jersey
MARCHESANI filed a case against COSTELLO, MAINS & SILVERMAN, LLC et al. The current summary does not provide details on the claims or the case's current status. This filing initiates the legal proceedings. The case is active in the District of New Jersey. Further filings will be necessary to understand the nature of
Central District of California
Calvin Sweeney et al filed a case against American Advisors Group et al. The current summary does not specify the nature of the claims or the current status of the litigation. This filing initiates the legal process between the parties. The case is pending in the Central District of California. Further filings will be
Northern District of Illinois
A forfeiture filing was made in the criminal case USA v. Muhammad. This action typically involves the government seeking to seize assets believed to be connected to criminal activity. It is a significant step in many federal prosecutions. The case is being handled in the Northern District of Illinois. Forfeiture
Northern District of Illinois
An extension of time to complete discovery was granted in Minelli v. Northeastern Illinois University et al. This means the parties have more time to gather evidence and information from each other. Discovery is a critical phase in civil litigation. The case is proceeding in the Northern District of Illinois. The
Northern District of Illinois
Burke is suing the Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al in the Northern District of Illinois. The case involves a motion for summary judgment. This indicates one party is asking the court to rule in their favor without a full trial.
Northern District of Illinois
Rodolight LLC et al are suing USA Truck Lines, Inc. et al in the Northern District of Illinois. The docket shows a filing to terminate motions. This suggests that certain pending motions in this civil case are being resolved or withdrawn.
Northern District of California
A joint case management statement was filed in the matter of Ryan et al. This document outlines the parties' agreement on how the case should proceed, including timelines for discovery and potential settlement discussions. It is a key step in managing complex litigation. The case is active in the Northern District of
District of Columbia
BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER BEACHES et al filed a status report in their case against KENNEDY. This filing provides an update on the case's progress to the court. Such reports are common in ongoing litigation. The case is being heard in the District of Columbia. The content of the status report is not detailed, but it
District of New Jersey
DIAZ REYES v. Warden, Delaney Hall Detention Facility et al is a civil case filed in the District of New Jersey. The filing is a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. This type of petition challenges the legality of a person's detention.
Southern District of New York
USA v. SILVA is a criminal matter in the Southern District of New York. The docket reflects a letter motion filed by one of the parties. Such motions typically seek court orders on specific procedural or substantive issues.
Southern District of New York
Chan et al have initiated a lawsuit against Sienna Marketing and Consulting, Inc. et al. The case is docketed in the Southern District of New York under number 24-cv-04071. No further details on the substance of the complaint are currently available.
Central District of California
Buster v. Blair et al is a civil case where an attorney representation issue is noted. The specific details of this representation are not available. The case is pending in the Central District of California. This filing suggests a procedural matter concerning legal counsel. Further information is needed to assess the
Central District of California
A summons request was filed in the case titled 'barz'. This action typically follows the filing of a complaint, indicating the plaintiff is seeking to formally notify the defendant(s) of the lawsuit. The court will likely issue the summons upon review. The case is pending in the Central District of California. The
Central District of California
Velgos v. Instant Technology, LLC is a civil case filed in the Central District of California. The docket shows an initial notification regarding the filing of a copyright action. This filing typically includes a cover sheet detailing the nature of the dispute.
Northern District of California
ICIMS, INC. filed a stipulation and proposed order in its case against ACERO PRECISION, LLC. The filing indicates a potential resolution or procedural step agreed upon by the parties. The court will review the proposed order for approval. The case is proceeding in the Northern District of California. Further details