Browse Cases

Central District of California

This civil case, JOHNSON et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY et al, is proceeding in the Central District of California. The defendant, E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Company, has filed its answer to the plaintiff's complaint. The core of the dispute likely revolves around the allegations presented in the complaint

District of Colorado

Lock filed a case against Zimmer US, Inc. et al. in the District of Colorado. The court issued a minute order, which is a brief record of proceedings or decisions. The specific nature of the order is not detailed.

Northern District of California

Bhardwaj appeared in the Northern District of California for an order on an international travel request. This suggests the defendant is subject to travel restrictions as part of their bail or release conditions. The court ruled on their request to travel abroad.

Northern District of California

Perez filed a notice of appearance, substitution, change, or withdrawal of attorney in their case against the County of Santa Clara in the Northern District of California. This filing pertains to the legal representation in the matter. It indicates a change in counsel or the formal entry of an attorney.

Northern District of Illinois

Culbreath requested and received an extension of time to complete discovery in their case against CVS Pharmacy, Inc. in the Northern District of Illinois. This order allows the parties more time to gather evidence. It suggests the discovery process is ongoing and potentially complex.

Central District of California

Gregory Scott Van Huisen's case against the United States All Three Branches resulted in a Memorandum/Opinion/Order from the United States Court of Appeals (USCA) in the Central District of California. This appellate decision reviews a lower court's ruling. The outcome could affirm, reverse, or remand the original

Central District of California

The United States filed a criminal action against Gallardo in the Central District of California. The report commencing this action, designated CR-64, formally initiates the prosecution. This signals the government's intent to pursue criminal charges.

Northern District of Illinois

Herrington initiated a lawsuit against Cory et al. in the Northern District of Illinois. No specific filing or action is detailed in the provided information. The case is active and proceeding through the court system.

Northern District of Illinois

Kristoff filed a case against Elite Dental Partners, LLC in the Northern District of Illinois. The current filing is a minute order, which typically records court proceedings or decisions. The specific content of the order is not detailed.

Northern District of Illinois

A protective order was issued in the case of Bendix v. Ferrara Candy Company in the Northern District of Illinois. This order limits the disclosure or use of sensitive information obtained during discovery. It aims to safeguard proprietary or confidential data.

Central District of California

Diamond Stone Funding, Inc. settled its case against Chaldean Enterprise, LLC in the Central District of California. This agreement resolves all claims between the parties, concluding the litigation. The terms of the settlement are typically confidential.

Northern District of Illinois

S.C. and others voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit against the New York City Department of Education in the Northern District of Illinois. This action ends the litigation, likely due to a settlement or a decision that further prosecution is not warranted.

District of Colorado

The District of Colorado issued an order to show cause in a case involving the Oakland Unified School District. This order requires a party to explain why a certain action should not be taken or why a specific outcome should not occur. It often follows a motion or a court's own inquiry.

Northern District of California

The Northern District of California issued an order addressing a motion for an extension of time to file. This suggests one party requested additional time to submit a document or pleading. The court granted or denied this request, impacting the litigation timeline.

Central District of California

Janisch appeared in the Central District of California for revocation proceedings. This indicates a prior criminal conviction or sentence is now subject to review for alleged violations. The court will determine if the terms of release or sentence have been breached.

Central District of California

Bell removed this civil case from state court to the Central District of California. The notice of removal indicates the case involves the United States as a party. This action shifts the litigation to federal jurisdiction.

District of Massachusetts

Chuqui Paredes has filed a civil suit against Moniz et al. A status report has been filed in the case. This report likely provides an update on the litigation's progress and any pending issues.

District of New Jersey

DELAHOY v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al is a civil case in the District of New Jersey. The current summary is not available.

Northern District of California

USA v. Archaga-Ayestas is a criminal case in the Northern District of California. The current summary is related to a payment record card.

Northern District of California

Showbox Corp. et al v. Maum Studio Inc. is a civil case in the Northern District of California. The court issued an order reassigning the case. The filing is related to case 25-cv-07719.