CASE NUMBER NOT USED

description

Case Summary

This case is a civil lawsuit with a docket number of 26-cv-01244. The case was assigned or reassigned, but no page count was specified. The case is currently in an unknown phase.

Latest development

2:26-cv-01244 Karma v. Chandler et al

Motion · April 24, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

• • civil lawsuit
• • docket number
• • unknown phase

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cv-01244 Dawn Stevens v. Arrow Salon et al

Other · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

4 articles

4 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ford Motor Company, Arrow Salon, 3:26-cv-01244 Capristo and others.

Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 4 distinct sources.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Case Timeline

4 events

info

Other April 27, 2026

2:26-cv-01244 Dawn Stevens v. Arrow Salon et al

The opt-out period for the MJDAP (Multi-District Antitrust Product) class action in Dawn Stevens v. Arrow Salon et al has expired. This means that any potential plaintiffs who did not opt out of the class action are now bound by its terms. The expiration of the opt-out period is significant because it limits the ability of individuals to pursue separate claims against the defendants.

description View filing open_in_new

info

Other April 24, 2026

3:26-cv-01244 Capristo et al v. Ford Motor Company

The parties in Capristo et al v. Ford Motor Company certified that they discussed alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, as required by local rule 3-5(b). This certification is a procedural step in the case, indicating that the parties have considered ADR before proceeding with litigation. The certification does not necessarily mean that ADR will be used.

description View filing open_in_new

edit_note

Motion April 24, 2026

2:26-cv-01244 Karma v. Chandler et al

A Motion was filed.

description View filing open_in_new

info

Other April 22, 2026

1:26-cv-01244 CASE NUMBER NOT USED

The case was assigned to a new judge. This change in assignment may affect the case's progress and outcome. The new judge will now oversee the case.

description View filing open_in_new

show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles

All No paywall (4) Original reporting (4)

newspaper

Coverage

2:26-cv-01244 Dawn Stevens v. Arrow Salon et al

MJDAP Opt-Out Expired

Apr 27, 2026 · 1 min read

newspaper

Coverage

3:26-cv-01244 Capristo et al v. Ford Motor Company

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options ( 13

Apr 24, 2026 · 1 min read

newspaper

Coverage

2:26-cv-01244 Karma v. Chandler et al

Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 4

Apr 24, 2026 · 1 min read

newspaper

Coverage

1:26-cv-01244 CASE NUMBER NOT USED

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Apr 22, 2026 · 1 min read