civil-litigation injunction discovery federal-courts court-watch

Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Mike Cerreta Auto Sales, Inc. et al

24-cv-02959 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Mike Cerreta Auto Sales, Inc. et al is a case with miscellaneous relief. The case was filed in the year 2024 with docket number 24-cv-02959. The parties involved have requested miscellaneous relief, which means that they have asked the court for various forms of assistance or intervention. The court has granted this request, which means that the parties have received the relief they requested.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • miscellaneous relief
  • request for assistance
  • court's decision
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

7:24-cv-02959 Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Mike Cerreta Auto Sales, Inc. et al

Other · Apr 28, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Mike Cerreta Auto Sales, Inc, 7:24-cv-02959 Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 8 hours ago

Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Mike Cerreta Auto Sales, Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 24-cv-02959.

The dispute currently identifies 7:24-cv-02959 Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc on one side and Mike Cerreta Auto Sales, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around miscellaneous relief, request for assistance, court's decision.

et al is a case with miscellaneous relief. The case was filed in the year 2024 with docket number 24-cv-02959. The parties involved have requested miscellaneous relief, which means that they have asked the court for various forms of assistance or intervention.

The court has granted this request, which means that the parties have received the relief they requested.

On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. filed a miscellaneous relief motion in the case Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. et al (7:24-cv-02959).

The motion was filed on an unspecified date. This filing is likely a request for some form of.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 28, 2026

7:24-cv-02959 Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Mike Cerreta Auto Sales, Inc. et al

Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. filed a miscellaneous relief motion in the case Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Mike Cerreta Auto Sales, Inc. et al (7:24-cv-02959). The motion was filed on an unspecified date. This filing is likely a request for some form of non-routine relief, such as a temporary restraining order or a discovery-related issue.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 8 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.