2:26-cv-04978 JAMES v. CAULEY et al.
Notice of Guidelines for Pro Se Filers ( 2
The plaintiffs in Carey et al v. Google LLC filed a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures, which is a required document in federal court cases. This filing is a routine disclosure of the parties involved in the case and their potential interests. The document is a standard part of the case filing process.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04978 JAMES v. CAULEY et al.
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
A Notice of Guidelines for Pro Se Filers was filed.
The plaintiffs in Carey et al v. Google LLC filed a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures, which is a required document in federal court cases. This filing is a routine disclosure of the parties involved in the case and their potential interests. The document is a standard part of the case filing process.
Notice of Guidelines for Pro Se Filers ( 2
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 2
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.