0:25-cv-62454 CANNET v. THE MAD ROOM HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
Extension of Time ( 31
CANNET v. THE MAD ROOM HOSPITALITY, LLC et al is a civil case where an extension of time has been granted. This occurred after 31 days of litigation. Extensions are typically granted to allow parties adequate time for filings or preparation.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
0:25-cv-62454 CANNET v. THE MAD ROOM HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes MAD ROOM HOSPITALITY, LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
CANNET v. THE MAD ROOM HOSPITALITY, LLC et al is an active civil matter under docket 25-cv-62454.
The main identified defendant or respondent is MAD ROOM HOSPITALITY, LLC. The case is currently organized around litigation.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the defendant, The Mad Room Hospitality, LLC, in the case of CANNET v. THE MAD ROOM HOSPITALITY, LLC et al, allowing them more time to respond to the plaintiff's claims. This extension is likely due to the complexity.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The court granted an extension of time for the defendant, The Mad Room Hospitality, LLC, in the case of CANNET v. THE MAD ROOM HOSPITALITY, LLC et al, allowing them more time to respond to the plaintiff's claims. This extension is likely due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional time to gather evidence. The extension will give the defendant more time to prepare their defense.
Extension of Time ( 31
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.