2:25-cv-03101 Fernando E. Hernandez v. Apria Healthcare, LLC et al
Text Only Scheduling Notice
The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Fernando E. Hernandez v. Apria Healthcare, LLC et al, which is a separate case from Campbell v. Citigroup. This notice sets a schedule for the case, but the details are not specified. The notice is a procedural step in the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-03101 Fernando E. Hernandez v. Apria Healthcare, LLC et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Apria Healthcare, LLC, 1:25-cv-03101 CAMPBELL, 2:25-cv-03101 Fernando E. Hernandez and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Fernando E. Hernandez v. Apria Healthcare, LLC et al, which is a separate case from Campbell v. Citigroup. This notice sets a schedule for the case, but the details are not specified. The notice is a procedural step in the case.
The court set and reset deadlines in the case of Campbell v. Citigroup. This action likely adjusted the timeline for various pre-trial motions and discovery processes. The exact nature of the deadline changes is not specified.
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.