5:25-cv-02850 Campbell et al v. Honey Science, LLC et al
Reply to Opposition/Response ( 95
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active. Latest development: 5:25-cv-02850 Campbell et al v. Honey Science, LLC et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:25-cv-02850 Campbell et al v. Honey Science, LLC et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Honey Science, LLC, 5:25-cv-02850 Campbell.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Campbell Seeks Reply to Opposition in Honey Science Lawsuit is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-02850.
The dispute currently identifies 5:25-cv-02850 Campbell on one side and Honey Science, LLC on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A response was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A response was filed.
Reply to Opposition/Response ( 95
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 10 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.