Calvary Chapel San Jose et al v. Cody et al
Case Summary
Calvary Chapel San Jose et al v. Cody et al is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in N.D. Cal.. The docket number on file is 20-cv-03794. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:20-cv-03794 Calvary Chapel San Jose et al v. Cody et al
Other · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Calvary Chapel San Jose and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event5:20-cv-03794 Calvary Chapel San Jose et al v. Cody et al
The case Calvary Chapel San Jose et al v. Cody et al is currently active in the Northern District of California under docket number 20-cv-03794. No substantive filings or rulings have been made public yet, so the case remains under observation for further developments. Juryvine is monitoring the docket for new information that could clarify the issues or parties involved.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.